GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Consider enable of parallelism inside framework. · utPLSQL/utPLSQL · Discussion #1332

Consider enable of parallelism inside framework. #1332

Unanswered
lwasylow asked this question in Feature Requests
Consider enable of parallelism inside framework. #1332
@lwasylow lwasylow
Mar 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Return to top
Discussion options
  • Uh oh!

    There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

lwasylow
Mar 28, 2019
Collaborator

Consider enable of parallelism inside framework using dbms parallel, job_chains etc.
What are pros and cons.

You must be logged in to vote
All reactions

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options
  • Uh oh!

    There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

pesse
Jun 21, 2021

Cons from my POV:

  • Adds a lot of complexity test-wise, especially when we want to support it on numerous database versions
  • Will probably make debugging and maintainability harder
  • There is an easy workaround by running utPLSQL-cli multiple times on different suitepaths/tags
You must be logged in to vote
All reactions
0 replies
Comment options
  • Uh oh!

    There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

jgebal
May 9, 2026
Maintainer

I had a look at junit5 about parallel and way its implemented there is the annotation declaration for suite or test methods. In their implementation it allows for permutations of parallel suites or test methods.

I think we should start with an annotation on the suite to parallelize all tests under it. Author is responsible for making them paralell safe.

So the suites will call serially but tests within suites that is annotated would run parallel.

The results would have to be stored in the table as the chunks will be run by different sessions.

The sample annotation couls looks like --%parallel(4)

In case of nested suite the parallel wil be inherited to child suites. The child suites will be run serial however the tests within these suites will run parallel as defined by parent suite.

We will have to make sure that coverage data will be linked to same runid or at least we are able to merge them from child session to coordinator session, same goes for reporting.

Originally posted by @lwasylow in #1144

You must be logged in to vote
All reactions
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
💡
Feature Requests
Labels
enhancement
3 participants
@lwasylow @jgebal @pesse
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #881 on May 09, 2026 17:18.

You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.