GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Drop support for coveralls · Issue #1172 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Drop support for coveralls #1172

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#1363
Closed
Drop support for coveralls#1172
#1363
Copy link
Labels
enhancement

Description

@jgebal
jgebal
opened on Dec 10, 2021
Issue body actions

Existing COVERALLS reporting is no longer easy to publish to COVERALLS.
If users would be using GithubActions/AzurePipelines etc., the preferred format would be LCOV.

The preferred way to publish coverage reports to Coveralls is via Coveralls App and this one accepts LCOV format.

The problem was discovered while trying to switch from Travis to GithubActions.
In fact, even existing Travis integration was not trivial as it required additional scripting on CI side to make the output JSON report consumable by Coveralss by adding MD5 hash for each source file reported.

A discussion on Coveralls led me to conclusion that the best approach would be to implement a new LCOV coverage reporter.

Activity

  1. jgebal
    added
    enhancement
    idea
    reporter
    on Dec 10, 2021
  2. jgebal commented on Dec 10, 2021

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on Dec 10, 2021
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Description of LCOV format can be found here
    A good interpretation of it can be also found in this parser, particularly in this file

  3. lwasylow commented on Dec 11, 2021

    @lwasylow
    lwasylow
    on Dec 11, 2021
    Member
    More actions

    Don't we already publish code coverage in sonar cloud? Just wonder if the lcov is a niche? I think most people using Jenkins or azure which consume cobertura. Just wonder how much uptake it will have and how many people actually using this format?

  4. jgebal
    removed
    reporter
    on Feb 22, 2022
  5. jgebal commented on May 9, 2026

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on May 9, 2026
    MemberAuthor
    More actions

    Consider dropping support for coveralls as it didn't become widely adopted (especially in PL/SQL)

  6. jgebal
    removed
    idea
    on May 9, 2026
  7. jgebal
    changed the title [-]Add LCOV coverage reporting as a replacement for COVERALLS reporting[/-] [+]Consider dropping support for coveralls[/+] on May 9, 2026
  8. jgebal
    changed the title [-]Consider dropping support for coveralls[/-] [+]Drop support for coveralls[/+] on May 9, 2026
  9. jgebal
    closed this as completedin #1363on Jun 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancement

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.