GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — get rid of calls to dbms_utility.name_resolve if possible · Issue #569 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

get rid of calls to dbms_utility.name_resolve if possible #569

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#943
#939
Closed
get rid of calls to dbms_utility.name_resolve if possible#569
#943
#939
Copy link
Labels
enhancement

Description

@jgebal
jgebal
opened on Jan 31, 2018
Issue body actions

Calls to dbms_utility.name_resolve are causing issues in the environments where schema_name and an object within the schema share the same name.
This was raised as an issue in utPLSQL itself:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45350935/utplsql-installation-ora-04047-error-when-exec-ut-run/48541758#48541758
And here is a bit of background to that issue from one of IBM forums:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=d8087c9d-39c2-4cf3-8e29-8611f48a4d6e

Need to review the need to call dbms_utility.name_resolve functionality as well as ways to efficiently replace it (if it's really needed)

Activity

  1. jgebal
    added
    enhancement
    on Jan 31, 2018
  2. jgebal
    changed the title [-]get rid of valls to dbms_utility.name_resolve if possible[/-] [+]get rid of calls to dbms_utility.name_resolve if possible[/+] on Jan 31, 2018
  3. Shoelace commented on Feb 14, 2018

    @Shoelace
    Shoelace
    on Feb 14, 2018
    Member
    More actions

    i added the calls to name_resolve ear;y on. it is supposed to be the way oracle itself resolves the name so maybe its just not catching the exception correctly.
    ut_metadata.do_resolve doesnt catch any exceptions so that is probably all thats needed..

    i dont think you can get rid of it otherwise the 'authid current_user' stuff doesnt work for running as not the ut owner.

  4. jgebal
    added a commit that references this issue on Jun 15, 2019

    Removed dependency on `dbms_utility.name_resolve`.

    This issue will close once commit 85942e9 is merged into the 'develop' branch.
    85942e9
  5. jgebal
    closed this as completedin #939on Jun 16, 2019
  6. lwasylow
    added a commit that references this issue on Jun 18, 2019

    Release/v3.1.7 (#942)

    This issue will close once commit 1a5c525 is merged into the 'develop' branch.
    1a5c525
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancement

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.