GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter generates wrong line breaks · Issue #917 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter generates wrong line breaks #917

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#943
#918
Closed
ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter generates wrong line breaks#917
#943
#918
Copy link
Assignees
jgebal
Labels
bug
Milestone
v3.1.7

Description

@tkleiber
tkleiber
opened on May 9, 2019
Issue body actions

I have generated attached coburtura coverage.
There are several linebreaks eg. in line 39 which breaks the xml validation against http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/xml/coverage-04.dtd.

ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter.zip

cobertura

Version:
OS: SLES 11.4
utPLSQL-cli 3.1.6.local
utPLSQL-java-api 3.1.6.411
Java-Version: 1.8.0_66
ORACLE_HOME: null
NLS_LANG: null

Activity

  1. pesse commented on May 10, 2019

    @pesse
    pesse
    on May 10, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    Do you have similar issues on e.g. JUnit-Reporter?

  2. tkleiber commented on May 10, 2019

    @tkleiber
    tkleiber
    on May 10, 2019
    Author
    More actions

    Junit Reporter works fine!

  3. dmpe commented on May 10, 2019

    @dmpe
    dmpe
    on May 10, 2019
    More actions

    Btw. can also some check the Sonar Test execution report as well?
    Coverage is working fine but test execution for sonarqube is not working for us. And we have suspected a malformed XML may be the cause.

    Thanks

  4. pesse commented on May 10, 2019

    @pesse
    pesse
    on May 10, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @dmpe Could you open a separate issue for this? I'm also not 100% sure if I understand your problem, maybe you can provide some more details

  5. jgebal commented on May 10, 2019

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on May 10, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @dmpe Please open a separate issue on utPLSQL main project.
    Reporter issues are most probably on the code side.
    Please also provide info on:

    • sonar server version you're using
    • the detailed type of problem you're facing
    • if possible, example of the XML report that you see as troublesome
  6. jgebal commented on May 10, 2019

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on May 10, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    @tkleiber - I'm moving this issue to utPLSQL main repo

  7. jgebal
    transferred this issue fromutPLSQL/utPLSQL-clion May 10, 2019
  8. jgebal commented on May 10, 2019

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on May 10, 2019
    Member
    More actions

    The issue was confirmed, tested and will be fixed by upcoming Pull Request

  9. jgebal
    self-assigned this
    on May 10, 2019
  10. jgebal
    added
    bug
    on May 10, 2019
  11. jgebal
    added this to the v3.1.7 milestone on May 10, 2019
  12. jgebal
    added a commit that references this issue on May 10, 2019

    Fixed issue with missing newlines in cobertura coverage for non-execu…

    This issue will close once commit 4d7bc3d is merged into the 'develop' branch.
    4d7bc3d
  13. jgebal
    closed this as completedin #918on May 11, 2019
  14. lwasylow
    added a commit that references this issue on Jun 18, 2019

    Release/v3.1.7 (#942)

    This issue will close once commit 1a5c525 is merged into the 'develop' branch.
    1a5c525
  15. tinovyatkin
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Aug 18, 2026

    test(coverage): pin real utPLSQL Cobertura report shape

    7c1a57c

    feat: coverage metric category — ingestion, auto-discovery, gates (#246)

    a2ac86a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

  • @jgebal
    jgebal

Labels

bug

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    • v3.1.7

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
    Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.