GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Gather coverage on code calling DBMS_STATS. by jgebal · Pull Request #1184 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Feb 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Implemented a workaround that allows for running utPLSQL tests with code coverage on source with calls to DBMS_STATS.
Resolves: #1097
Resolves: #1094

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
@jgebal
Gather coverage on code calling DBMS_STATS.
201050f 
Implemented a workaround that allows for running utPLSQL tests with code coverage on source with calls to DBMS_STATS.
Resolves: #1097
Resolves: #1094
@jgebal jgebal added this to the 3.1.12 milestone Feb 6, 2022
@jgebal
jgebal requested a review from lwasylow February 6, 2022 22:49
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Feb 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit Test Results

       1 files         2 suites   1m 44s ⏱️
1 023 tests 1 019 ✔️ 4 💤 0 ❌
1 026 runs  1 018 ✔️ 8 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 9912dfa.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 6, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1184 (9912dfa) into develop (ab1acfa) will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1184      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.86%   94.75%   -0.12%     
===========================================
  Files          104      104              
  Lines         4853     4859       +6     
  Branches        21       21              
===========================================
  Hits          4604     4604              
- Misses         241      247       +6     
  Partials         8        8
Flag Coverage Δ
11xe 94.13% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
18xe 94.41% <0.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
21xe 94.57% <0.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/core/coverage/ut_coverage_helper_block.pkb 55.00% <0.00%> (-23.58%) ⬇️
source/core/ut_utils.pkb 94.19% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08bb27b...9912dfa. Read the comment docs.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
Removing comment line that keeps getting updated with update_project_…
9912dfa 
…version action
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Feb 7, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lwasylow
lwasylow approved these changes Feb 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
@jgebal
jgebal merged commit 751d983 into develop Feb 8, 2022
@jgebal
jgebal deleted the feature/ignore_coverage_failure_1097 branch February 8, 2022 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lwasylow lwasylow lwasylow approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v3.1.12

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ORA-08402: error executing PL/SQL code coverage Error on call of coverage stop in java

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@jgebal @lwasylow
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.