GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Feature/framework performance by jgebal · Pull Request #1249 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Mar 20, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Added some random improvements

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
jgebal added 3 commits February 11, 2023 13:00
@jgebal
Small performance improvements to output buffer handling and some tests.
28b6eaa
@jgebal
Performance improvements in output buffer for reporters that only pro…
521fe47 
…duce data after the whole run is finished.
@jgebal
Fixes to new data-buffer implementation.
6c0b6e6
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit Test Results

       1 files         2 suites   4m 59s ⏱️
1 034 tests 1 030 ✔️ 4 💤 0 ❌
1 037 runs  1 029 ✔️ 8 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 6c0b6e6.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Mar 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 8 Code Smells

89.2% 89.2% Coverage
8.5% 8.5% Duplication
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 89.87% and project coverage change: -0.11 ⚠️

Comparison is base (5cf7f34) 94.86% compared to head (6c0b6e6) 94.76%.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1249      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.86%   94.76%   -0.11%     
===========================================
  Files          108      109       +1     
  Lines         5105     5177      +72     
  Branches        23       24       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits          4843     4906      +63     
- Misses         255      263       +8     
- Partials         7        8       +1
Flag Coverage Δ
11XE 94.19% <89.74%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
12.1EE 94.19% <89.74%> (-0.09%) ⬇️
18XE 94.36% <87.34%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
21XE 94.54% <87.34%> (-0.12%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...urce/core/output_buffers/ut_output_bulk_buffer.tpb 87.50% <87.50%> (ø)
source/api/ut.pkb 92.92% <90.90%> (-0.35%) ⬇️
...rce/core/output_buffers/ut_output_table_buffer.tpb 83.63% <100.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
source/core/ut_utils.pkb 94.45% <100.00%> (-0.23%) ⬇️
...ource/reporters/ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter.tpb 96.96% <100.00%> (ø)
source/reporters/ut_coverage_html_reporter.tpb 88.88% <100.00%> (ø)
source/reporters/ut_coverage_sonar_reporter.tpb 68.57% <100.00%> (ø)
source/reporters/ut_coveralls_reporter.tpb 74.28% <100.00%> (ø)
source/reporters/ut_junit_reporter.tpb 94.20% <100.00%> (ø)
source/reporters/ut_sonar_test_reporter.tpb 97.72% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
jgebal merged commit 8b01a39 into develop Mar 30, 2023
@jgebal
jgebal deleted the feature/framework_performance branch March 30, 2023 18:57
@jgebal jgebal added this to the v3.1.14 milestone May 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v3.1.14

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@jgebal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.