GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Support multiple expectation failures with teamcity reporter by jgebal · Pull Request #1251 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Apr 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

When running unit tests with TeamCity reporter in JetBrains IDE like IntelliJ or DataGrip, only first failed expectation is reported for a test, even in there are multiple failing expectations.

That is changed with this PR and so now all the failing expectations will be shown when running utPLSQL unit tests with DataGrip or IntelliJ

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
jgebal added 3 commits April 12, 2023 19:54
@jgebal
Improvements to teamcity reporter (used by DataGrip and IntelliJ - Je…
e6a6a4c 
…tBrains IDEs)

The reporter will now report all errors and all failed expectations.
The test description will be used instead of test name.
@jgebal
Adding Oracle 23-free-developer-edition
0497dcf
@jgebal
Adjusted tests for ORacle 23c (change of error message for ORA-06502)
55a2ecf
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit Test Results

       1 files         2 suites   2m 1s ⏱️
1 035 tests 1 031 ✔️ 4 💤 0 ❌
1 039 runs  1 031 ✔️ 8 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 73e9cf3.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.19 ⚠️

Comparison is base (8b01a39) 94.78% compared to head (73e9cf3) 94.59%.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1251      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.78%   94.59%   -0.19%     
===========================================
  Files          109      109              
  Lines         5173     5257      +84     
  Branches        24       33       +9     
===========================================
+ Hits          4903     4973      +70     
- Misses         262      277      +15     
+ Partials         8        7       -1
Flag Coverage Δ
11XE 94.18% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
12.1EE 94.22% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
18XE 94.40% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
21XE 94.57% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
23free 94.20% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
source/reporters/ut_teamcity_reporter_helper.pkb 91.66% <ø> (-1.82%) ⬇️
source/reporters/ut_teamcity_reporter.tpb 94.73% <100.00%> (+0.29%) ⬆️

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
Added missing test for multiple expectation failures with exception t…
73e9cf3 
…hrown.
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Apr 27, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
jgebal merged commit 320b3b0 into develop Apr 28, 2023
@jgebal
jgebal deleted the feature/improvements_to_teamcity_reporter branch April 28, 2023 09:10
@jgebal jgebal added this to the v3.1.14 milestone May 21, 2023
@jgebal jgebal mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2026
ut_teamcity_reporter() doesn't show top-level error when test failed #1109
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v3.1.14

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@jgebal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.