GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — `throws` can reference exception without schema or package name by jgebal · Pull Request #1365 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It is now possible to reference a variable name or exception name without providing fully qualified name. utPLSQL will resolve the name of variable based on current unit test package owner and current unit test package name.

Resolves: #1223

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Jacek Gębal
throws can reference exception without schema or package name
7b0cc19 
It is now possible to reference a variable name or exception name without providing fully qualified name. utPLSQL will resolve the name of variable based on current unit test package owner and current unit test package name.

Resolves: #1223
@jgebal jgebal self-assigned this Jun 8, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

    1 files    103 suites   3m 9s ⏱️
1 129 tests 1 125 ✅ 4 💤 0 ❌
1 133 runs  1 125 ✅ 8 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 7b0cc19.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 8, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.87%. Comparing base (3135d81) to head (7b0cc19).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1365   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    94.86%   94.87%           
========================================
  Files          111      111           
  Lines         5457     5459    +2     
  Branches        30       30           
========================================
+ Hits          5177     5179    +2     
  Misses         263      263           
  Partials        17       17
Flag Coverage Δ
19se 94.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
21XE 95.00% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
23-free 94.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
jgebal merged commit c00a746 into develop Jun 9, 2026
15 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@jgebal
jgebal deleted the bugfix/throws_annotation_inconsistency branch June 9, 2026 11:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@jgebal jgebal

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

--%throws annotation named package constant/variable not recognized

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@jgebal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.