GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — `throws` works with uninitialized exception variables by jgebal · Pull Request #1366 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

Conversation

@jgebal

@jgebal jgebal commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It is now possible to reference an uninitialized exception variable name.
utPLSQL will handle the exception properly.

Resolves: #1340

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
Jacek Gębal added 2 commits June 9, 2026 14:37
Jacek Gębal
throws works with uninitialized exception variables
34bedae
It is now possible to reference an uninitialized exception variable name.
utPLSQL will handle the exception properly.

Resolves: #1340
Jacek Gębal
throws works with uninitialized exception variables
71e7aba
It is now possible to reference an uninitialized exception variable name.
utPLSQL will handle the exception properly.

Resolves: #1340
@jgebal jgebal self-assigned this Jun 9, 2026
Jacek Gębal
Fixing typo in documentation
a37cb5e
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

    1 files  ±0    103 suites  ±0   3m 5s ⏱️ -3s
1 131 tests +2  1 127 ✅ +2  4 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 135 runs  +2  1 127 ✅ +2  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 797e401. ± Comparison against base commit c00a746.

This pull request removes 4 and adds 6 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Gives failure when a exception is expected and nothing is thrown
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Gives failure when the raised exception is different that the annotated one using variable
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Success when match exception even if other variable on list dont exists
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Success when one of exception from mixed list of number and constant is thrown
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Gives failure when an exception is expected and nothing is thrown
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Gives failure when the raised exception is different than the annotated one using variable
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Success when match exception even if another variable on list doesn't exists
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Success when one of exception from a mixed list of number and constant is thrown
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ Uninitialized exception variable can be used successfully in a test
utplsql.ut3_tester.core.annotations.test_annot_throws_exception ‑ a Failure report shows all expected exceptions

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Jacek Gębal
Update of failing tests
e6f768e
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.81%. Comparing base (c00a746) to head (797e401).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1366      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    94.87%   94.81%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          111      111              
  Lines         5459     5460       +1     
  Branches        30       31       +1     
===========================================
- Hits          5179     5177       -2     
- Misses         263      266       +3     
  Partials        17       17              
Flag Coverage Δ
19se 94.80% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
21XE 94.95% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
23-free 94.57% <100.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Jacek Gębal added 2 commits June 9, 2026 17:00
Jacek Gębal
Adding an extra test to extend coverage.
bfd1a9a
Jacek Gębal
Update datatype
797e401
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
2 New issues
4 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@jgebal
jgebal merged commit e47ec38 into develop Jun 9, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

@jgebal jgebal

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

1 participant

@jgebal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.