GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Show Disable Reason in Result Window · Issue #25 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL-PLSQL-Developer

Show Disable Reason in Result Window #25

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Open
Open
Show Disable Reason in Result Window#25
Copy link
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request

Description

@simasch
simasch
opened on Feb 7, 2022
Issue body actions

utPLSQL adds a reason to a disabled test: utPLSQL/utPLSQL#610

Add the reason to the result window if the test is disabled.

Activity

  1. simasch
    added
    enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
    on Feb 7, 2022
  2. jgebal commented on Feb 7, 2022

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on Feb 7, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    Currently the ut_realtime_reporter is producing following output with disabled flag:

    <test>
        <disabled>true</disabled>
    </test>

    If test is not disabled we get the following outcome.

    <test>
        <disabled>false</disabled>
    </test>

    To keep backward compatibility we should not change that behaviour and add another flag.
    I suggest introduction of <disabled_reason><![CDATA[Disabled reason description]]></disabled_reason>

    So the results would be one of:

    • Disabled without reason
    <test>
        <disabled>true</disabled>
    </test>
    • Disabled with reason
    <test>
        <disabled>true</disabled>
        <disabled_reason><![CDATA[the reason]]></disabled_reason>
    </test>
    • Enabled
    <test>
        <disabled>false</disabled>
    </test>
  3. jgebal commented on Feb 7, 2022

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on Feb 7, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    @simasch @lwasylow @PhilippSalvisberg

  4. lwasylow commented on Feb 7, 2022

    @lwasylow
    lwasylow
    on Feb 7, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    I allowed myself to correct your post @jgebal as the word fale got me really confused :P
    I totally agree that a new flag called disabled_reason would be best way.

    Reacted by Jacek Gębal
    Reacted by Philipp Salvisberg
    Reacted by Jacek Gębal
  5. PhilippSalvisberg commented on Feb 25, 2022

    @PhilippSalvisberg
    PhilippSalvisberg
    on Feb 25, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    I explained in utPLSQL/utPLSQL#1192 why I would use CamelCase and name the node disabledReason. IMO the next step is to implement the change outlined there.

  6. PhilippSalvisberg commented on Feb 27, 2022

    @PhilippSalvisberg
    PhilippSalvisberg
    on Feb 27, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    Version 1.4.0 of the SQLDev extension can show the disabled reason. Here's a screenshot:

    image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.