GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Is there a log4j vulnerability in utPLSQL-cli? · Issue #203 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL-cli

Is there a log4j vulnerability in utPLSQL-cli? #203

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#204
Closed
Is there a log4j vulnerability in utPLSQL-cli?#203
#204
Copy link

Description

@ghost
ghost
opened on Feb 4, 2022

The lib supplied with the latest release slf4j-api 1.7.26.jar allows a possibility of a log4j attack.

https://www.slf4j.org/log4shell.html

How is this being addressed?

Activity

  1. pesse commented on Feb 4, 2022

    @pesse
    pesse
    on Feb 4, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    Thanks for bringing this up.
    Will provide an update as soon as possible.
    However, in order to exploit Log4shell here, you'd need access to the database the cli is run against and create a test with a malicious name.
    Possible, but very unlikely.

  2. jgebal commented on Mar 13, 2022

    @jgebal
    jgebal
    on Mar 13, 2022
    Member
    More actions

    How would you see the log4j issue to be exploited in this software?
    We will definitely update the log4j library or remove it at some point when working on new features/bugfixes for cli.
    I'm not sure however if there is real value in fixing it by itself.

    Does it block you in any way at the moment?

  3. pesse
    added a commit that references this issue on Jun 9, 2022

    Update dependencies

    This issue will close once commit 79d69ff is merged into the 'develop' branch.
    79d69ff
  4. pesse
    closed this as completedin #204on Jun 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
      Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.