GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
  • [ date ]
  • [ thread ]
  • [ subject ]
  • [ author ]

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing mail.python.org — [Python-Dev] Optimization of Python ASTs: How should we deal with constant values?

[Python-Dev] Optimization of Python ASTs: How should we deal with constant values?

Frank Wierzbicki fwierzbicki at gmail.com
Sun May 18 20:49:09 CEST 2008

  • Previous message: [Python-Dev] Optimization of Python ASTs: How should we deal with constant values?
  • Next message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Thomas Lee <tom at vector-seven.com> wrote:
> Any Jython folk care to weigh in on this? If there are no major objections I
> think I'm going to forge ahead with an independant Const() node.
I suspect that having a marker for non-int non-str constants could
also be used for some optimization of Jython bytecode emissions as
well, though of course it would depend on the details.  If the path
from raw AST to optimized AST isn't too crazy Jython can just grow the
same logic.  We have really good AST comparison tests these days, so I
bet it won't be a huge problem for us when the time comes.

-Frank

  • Previous message: [Python-Dev] Optimization of Python ASTs: How should we deal with constant values?
  • Next message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.