GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • [ date ]
  • [ thread ]
  • [ subject ]
  • [ author ]

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing mail.python.org — [Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0

[Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0

Fred Drake fdrake at acm.org
Wed May 21 02:39:39 CEST 2008

  • Previous message: [Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0
  • Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So what do people think of including a ProxyBase implementation in  
> 2.6 and 3.0 that explicitly delegates all of the C-level slots to a  
> designated target instance?


On May 20, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Sounds good to me.

Same here.  There's an implementation in zope.proxy which might be  
useful as a starting point:

     http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.proxy/3.4.0

I'd be willing to write the required documentation, since I'm partly  
to blame for the implementation.

The short description of the package on PyPI contains a typo; that's  
been fixed in Subversion.  :-)


   -Fred

-- 
Fred Drake   <fdrake at acm.org>





  • Previous message: [Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0
  • Next message: [Python-Dev] Issue 643841: Including a new-style proxy base class in 2.6/3.0
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.