GeezerVison

Jesse Noller wrote:
 > Georg kindly published the PEP I submitted last night to the PEP site:
 >
 > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0371/
 >
 > This PEP includes some of the previous discussion on the processing
 > module's inclusion, and I hope clears up/clarifies some of the
 > goals/non goals and issues. I also included benchmark data and a link
 > to the code used for said benchmarks.
 >
 > I would like to renew the discussion now that "there is a PEP" to see
 > if there are any outstanding things people would like to get resolved.
 > I chose to continue to push it for 2.6 / 3.0 inclusion due to feedback
 > both here and elsewhere that people would rather see this in sooner in
 > some form, rather than later (i.e.: 2.7/3.1).

+1 from me (under the 'multiprocessing' name, with the understanding 
that some code duplication with other parts of the standard library may 
still remain in 2.6/3.0).

 From a non-web programmer's point of view, it seems like even more of a 
gain than standard library support for JSON ;)

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org