GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • [ date ]
  • [ thread ]
  • [ subject ]
  • [ author ]

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing mail.python.org — [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?

[Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Dec 2 21:39:02 EST 2017

  • Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
  • Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2 December 2017 at 12:01, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> The PEP only mentions function?() as a rejected idea, do I don't know
> why we're even talking about it. The PEP is deferred, with considerable
> opposition and luke-warm support, even the PEP author has said he's not
> going to push for it, and we're arguing about a pedantic point related
> to a part of the PEP which is rejected...

Nevertheless, I've fixed the rationale for that decision so folks
don't get hung up on the mistake in the previously noted rationale:
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/966dd426787e6de8ec6218955cec57f65086c5b4

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

  • Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
  • Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
  • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.