GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing mail.python.org — [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional? [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?Eric V. Smith eric at trueblade.comWed Dec 20 20:29:41 EST 2017
On 12/20/2017 8:13 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote: >> There is definitely a passive bias towards using types with >> dataclasses in that the Eric (the author) doesn't appear to want an >> example without them in the pep/docs. > > I'm not sure what such an example would look like. Do you mean without > annotations? Or do you mean without specifying the "correct" type, like: > > @dataclass > class C: > x: int = 'hello world' > > ? > > Or something else? > > Can you provide an example of what you'd like to see? Re-reading my post you referenced, is it just an example using typing.Any? I'm okay with that in the docs, I just didn't want to focus on it in the PEP. I want the PEP to only have the one reference to typing, for typing.ClassVar. I figure the people reading the PEP can extrapolate to all of the possible uses for annotations that they don't need to see a typing.Any example. Eric.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list |
| You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |