GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing phabricator.wikimedia.org — T239010 Add Extension:InterwikiExtracts to outreach
Assigned To None Authored By
Referenced Files None Subscribers
Description Please add https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:InterwikiExtracts to Outreach. It has a lot of original content but overlaps with meta for some things (e.g. Wikimedian in Residence info) and it's a pain to recreate and import a million modules and templates from meta, commons, en.wp, etc. I believe that this can resolve this problem by allowing us to import content live. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
Related Objects Event TimelineRestricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptNov 24 2019, 7:51 AM2019-11-24 07:51:44 (UTC+0) Aklapper removed projects: MediaWiki-Core-Snapshots, Outreach-Programs-Projects.Edited · Nov 24 2019, 3:50 PM2019-11-24 15:50:38 (UTC+0) Comment Actions(Removing Outreach-Programs-Projects as this is unrelated to Outreach Programs (see project description). Removing MediaWiki-Core-Snapshots as this task is not about the import or export code in the MediaWiki core codebase.) @Koavf: By "outreach", do you mean outreach.wikimedia.org ? If so, https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requesting_wiki_configuration_changes would apply. However, https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:InterwikiExtracts is not yet deployed on any Wikimedia website, so the entire extension code needs to get security-reviewed etc, see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Review_queue for steps required. Comment Actions Yes, I meant outreach.wikimedia.org. What is the best way to solve the problem I mentioned above? Comment Actions If I understand correctly, this is related to T6547: Cross-Wikimedia inclusion (interwiki templates transclusion, etc.) unsupported or T11890: Interwiki transclusions are unreasonably inefficient ? @Masumrezarock100: Which existing configuration variables does this affect that makes this task a Wikimedia-Site-requests? Comment Actions Correct: we need both standard modules and templates included without having to remake them or import every revision over and over again, plus we want to include some content in form of actual pages from other wikis like Meta. Masumrezarock100 removed a project: Wikimedia-Site-requests.Edited · Nov 25 2019, 12:45 AM2019-11-25 00:45:30 (UTC+0) Comment Actions
Oh right. Per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/178/ Wikimedia-Extension-setup tag may be used for extension installation requests. Urbanecm changed the task status from Open to Stalled.Nov 25 2019, 7:42 AM2019-11-25 07:42:17 (UTC+0) Comment ActionsAs far as I see, that extension is not deployed at any Wikimedia site. For us to be able to do that, the extension needs to be reviewed for security, performance and where applicable, for design. It also needs an active maintainer, who should request such reviews and act on them. See more at https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Review_queue Comment Actions @Koavf: Hi, do you plan to follow the required steps on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment for this request? Comment Actions No reply; assuming no. Content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 unless otherwise noted; code licensed under GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 or later and other open source licenses. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Code of Conduct. · Wikimedia Foundation · Privacy Policy · Code of Conduct · Terms of Use · Disclaimer · CC-BY-SA · GPL · Credits | |||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |