GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — udp errors should result in protocol.error_received, inconsistent with vanilla asyncio by jensbjorgensen · Pull Request #601 · MagicStack/uvloop Conversation
Contributor
I observed a condition in production where a temporary network outage caused a UDP sendto to fail. In stock asyncio this would result in a call to error_received on the protocol object, but in uvloop this results in a fatal error that closes the transport. This is a rather nasty thing to happen since with vanilla asyncio when the transient network condition was resolved the transport could again be used, but with uvloop you would have to close the transport and repoen it.. See cpython source here: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Lib/asyncio/selector_events.py#L1240 Sorry I don't have a script/fragment to reproduce the error, to do this you'd have to manipulate the networking stack such that the interface was not available after the transport was created. It's possible of course but I don't know of an easy way to do this.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
fantix
requested changes
Comment on lines
+257
to
+260
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this can be replaced by calling
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This needs to be wrapped with
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
jensbjorgensen
force-pushed
the
udp_protocol_error_not_fatal
branch
from
e55cebd to
dd53a3e
Compare
fantix
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
fantix
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Changes ======= * Add cleanup_socket param on create_unix_server() (#623) (by @fantix in d6114d2) Fixes ===== * Use cythonized SO_REUSEPORT rather than the unwrapped native one. (#609) (by @ptribble in 4083a94 for #550) * UDP errors should result in protocol.error_received (#601) (by @jensbjorgensen in 3c3bbef) * Updates for Cython3 (#587) (by @alan-brooks in 3fba9fa for #587) * Test with Python 3.13 (#610) (by @edgarrmondragon in fb5a139)
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |