GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Improve error handling for cab extraction and limit module name to 128 characters by adityapatwardhan · Pull Request #28212 · PowerShell/PowerShell Conversation
Member
PR SummaryThis pull request improves the robustness and security of the Cabinet extraction and Updatable Help code in PowerShell. The changes focus on better error handling for file operations, stricter validation of CAB entry paths, and defensive checks on module names to prevent issues with excessively long file paths. Error handling and robustness improvements:
Security and validation enhancements:
Defensive checks and user feedback:
PR ContextPR Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Aditya Patwardhan (adityapatwardhan)
requested review from
a team and
Dongbo Wang (daxian-dbw)
as code owners
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🟡 Changes recommendedRegression coverage is needed for the module-name boundary and CAB extraction failure paths. 2 open findingsWhat changed in this PRThis PR hardens PowerShell’s Updatable Help processing against CAB extraction failures and oversized module names. Changes:
🧠 Review effort: Balanced 💡 Add a
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Comment on lines
+486
to
+488
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Copilot code review
Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
CL-General
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |