GeezerVison is showing github.com — Update ruff to `0.14.10` by ShaharNaveh · Pull Request #6271 · RustPython/RustPython
Conversation
ShaharNaveh
commented
Nov 15, 2025
•
edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary by CodeRabbit
- Chores
- Updated Ruff-related dependencies to version 0.14.10, including updates to the Python parser, AST, text size, and source file modules.
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
coderabbitai
Bot
commented
Nov 15, 2025
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
This pull request updates Ruff-related dependencies in Cargo.toml from version 0.14.1 to 0.14.10. Four crates are bumped: ruff_python_parser, ruff_python_ast, ruff_text_size, and ruff_source_file. Their corresponding git revision hashes are updated to align with the new Ruff tag.
Changes
| Cohort / File(s) |
Summary |
Ruff dependency version bumps Cargo.toml |
Updated four Ruff-related dependencies (ruff_python_parser, ruff_python_ast, ruff_text_size, ruff_source_file) from tag 0.14.1 to 0.14.10 with corresponding git revision hash updates |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🐰 Ruff edges smoothed with a gentle hop,
From 0.14.1 to ten we did not stop,
Four crates aligned in perfect time,
Dependencies dance—a parser's rhyme! ✨
Pre-merge checks
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
| Check name |
Status |
Explanation |
| Description Check |
✅ Passed |
Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check |
✅ Passed |
The title 'Update ruff to 0.14.10' directly and clearly summarizes the main change in the pull request: bumping the ruff dependency from version 0.14.1 to 0.14.10. |
| Docstring Coverage |
✅ Passed |
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3afd46 and 389d9d7.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
Lib/test/test_syntax.py is excluded by !Lib/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-27T14:03:49.034Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-27T14:03:49.034Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.py : Use ruff for linting Python code
Applied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-12-27T14:03:49.034Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: RustPython/RustPython PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-12-27T14:03:49.034Z
Learning: RustPython is a Python 3 interpreter written in Rust implementing Python 3.13.0+ compatibility with complete Python environment in Rust (not CPython bindings), clean implementation without compatibility hacks, and cross-platform support including WebAssembly compilation
Applied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Run rust tests (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: Run snippets and cpython tests (windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Cargo.toml (2)
154-159: Commit hash verified against ruff tag 0.14.10.
The commit hash 45bbb4cbffe73cf925d4579c2e3eb413e0539390 correctly corresponds to ruff tag 0.14.10. All four ruff crate dependencies are pinned to the same commit hash, which ensures consistent versions and reproducible builds.
154-159: ruff 0.14.10 upgrade is safe—no breaking changes or security vulnerabilities in this version.
Verification shows:
- No breaking changes in 0.14.10 (the breaking change for Python 3.14 default was introduced in 0.14.0)
- No security advisories for 0.14.10; CVE-2025-62518 was fixed in 0.14.2, well before this version
- The specific test failure reference (PR #21163) could not be verified in public sources, but the codebase appropriately manages failing tests through test markers as seen in recent commits
The commit hash approach for reproducible builds is sound.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ShaharNaveh reacted with eyes emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
lets mark it as expected failure and merge this. it doesn't hurt user experience.
|
ShaharNaveh reacted with thumbs up emoji
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Feb 11, 2026
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|