GeezerVison is showing github.com — Updated libs status show datetime utc by ShaharNaveh · Pull Request #7082 · RustPython/RustPython
Conversation
ShaharNaveh
commented
Feb 11, 2026
•
edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary by CodeRabbit
- Chores
- Updated automated status updates to display date and time in UTC timezone with explicit timezone label for clarity.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
coderabbitai
Bot
commented
Feb 11, 2026
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
This pull request modifies a GitHub Actions workflow to switch from local time to UTC time when generating timestamps. The date command is updated to use the -u flag, and the output label is appended with " (UTC)" to clarify the timezone.
Changes
| Cohort / File(s) |
Summary |
Timezone Standardization
.github/workflows/update-libs-status.yaml |
Changed date command from local to UTC using date -u flag and appended " (UTC)" label to body output for timezone clarity. |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
- Auto update lib status #7074: Modifies the same GitHub Actions workflow file and the current PR's UTC timestamp changes are directly related to that PR's date and body-generation steps.
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🐰 Time marches on in UTC so fine,
No more local zones will blur the line!
With date -u we race east, precise and bright,
The workflow speaks truth in coordinated light! ⏰
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
| Check name |
Status |
Explanation |
| Description Check |
✅ Passed |
Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check |
✅ Passed |
The title clearly describes the main change: updating the libs status workflow to display datetime in UTC instead of local time. |
| Docstring Coverage |
✅ Passed |
No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- Create PR with unit tests
- Post copyable unit tests in a comment
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.