GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Fix `staticmethod` and `classmethod` repr error propagation by YangSiJun528 · Pull Request #8371 · RustPython/RustPython

Conversation

@YangSiJun528

@YangSiJun528 YangSiJun528 commented Jul 25, 2026 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Related to Fuzzing RustPython with fusil #8325 (RUSTPY-0009, RUSTPY-0011)
  • This PR follows our AI policy

Summary

  • Propagate exceptions from the repr() implementations of staticmethod and classmethod.
  • Add regression tests for both descriptor types.

staticmethod and classmethod used repr(vm).unwrap() in their repr_str() implementations, which turned exceptions raised by the wrapped object's __repr__() into Rust panics.

Since repr_str() already returns PyResult<String>, this change uses ? to propagate the original Python exception unchanged, matching CPython's behavior.

Testing

  • cargo run -- extra_tests/snippets/syntax_class.py

Regression tests were added for both descriptor types.
Before this change, both test cases triggered a Rust panic when the wrapped object's __repr__() raised an exception.

AI assistance

Codex (GPT-5.6 Sol) was used to investigate and implement this change.
I reviewed and validated all AI-assisted work.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling when displaying staticmethod and classmethod objects.
    • Representation errors now propagate correctly instead of causing an unexpected application failure.
  • Tests

    • Added coverage confirming that errors raised while representing wrapped callbacks are reported correctly.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@YangSiJun528
Propagate method wrapper repr errors
b9b219d
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 25, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2189c7b4-ad06-4315-916d-de99d4dc20b6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 003ebec and b9b219d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • crates/vm/src/builtins/classmethod.rs
  • crates/vm/src/builtins/staticmethod.rs
  • extra_tests/snippets/syntax_class.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Changes

Representation error propagation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Descriptor repr error handling
crates/vm/src/builtins/classmethod.rs, crates/vm/src/builtins/staticmethod.rs, extra_tests/snippets/syntax_class.py
classmethod and staticmethod now propagate callable repr failures instead of unwrapping and panicking; tests verify both raise the stored RuntimeError.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers: shaharnaveh

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the main change: fixing repr error propagation for staticmethod and classmethod.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
  • X
  • Mastodon
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@moreal moreal added the z-ca-2026 Tag to track Contribution Academy 2026 label Jul 25, 2026
youknowone
youknowone approved these changes Jul 26, 2026
View reviewed changes

@youknowone youknowone left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for working on it 👍 looks good!

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@youknowone
youknowone merged commit 92fe3fd into RustPython:main Jul 26, 2026
26 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@YangSiJun528 YangSiJun528 mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2026
Fuzzing RustPython with fusil #8325
Open
youknowone pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2026
@YangSiJun528
Propagate method wrapper repr errors (#8371)
8ba361d
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@youknowone youknowone youknowone approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

z-ca-2026 Tag to track Contribution Academy 2026

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@YangSiJun528 @youknowone @moreal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.