GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Implement `PyModule_AddFunctions` by bschoenmaeckers · Pull Request #9484 · RustPython/RustPython Conversation
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Register methods in a module crates/capi/src/modsupport.rs |
Adds PyModule_AddFunctions. It converts the module pointer, retrieves the module name, builds each method, assigns its __module__ attribute, and stores it in the module dictionary. Errors propagate through with_vm. |
Priority:
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Change: Feature
sequenceDiagram
participant CCaller
participant PyModule_AddFunctions
participant with_vm
participant build_method_def
participant ModuleDictionary
CCaller->>PyModule_AddFunctions: pass module pointer and method definitions
PyModule_AddFunctions->>with_vm: run registration operation
with_vm->>PyModule_AddFunctions: execute operation with VM
PyModule_AddFunctions->>build_method_def: build function for each definition
build_method_def-->>PyModule_AddFunctions: return function
PyModule_AddFunctions->>ModuleDictionary: store function under method name
Possibly related PRs
b4d9eThe new module-function registration has no identified blocking issue and is mergeable subject to normal checks.
Explanation
No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b4d9e928a6
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.