GeezerVison is showing github.com — Make `build_method_def` a associated function by bschoenmaeckers · Pull Request #9490 · RustPython/RustPython
Conversation
bschoenmaeckers
commented
Oct 30, 2026
•
edited by coderabbitai
Bot
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary by CodeRabbit
- Refactor
- Internal method-definition handling was reorganized across method and descriptor creation, as well as module and type registration.
- Existing method creation, validation, and registration behavior remains unchanged, so there are no reported changes to the end-user experience.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
Codex Review Summary
This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
| Review |
Status |
Commit |
Review trigger |
| 📝 Code Review |
✅ Completed 2026-10-30T16:39:28.325776Z |
9ca21d4 |
PR opened |
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
coderabbitai
Bot
commented
Oct 30, 2026
•
edited
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.
Recent review info
-
Run configuration
-
Commits
-
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a838216 and 9ca21d4.
Files selected for processing: 4
-
crates/capi/src/descrobject.rs
crates/capi/src/methodobject.rs
crates/capi/src/modsupport.rs
crates/capi/src/object/pytype.rs
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.
Walkthrough
-
build_method_def moved from a module-level function to an inherent PyMethodDef method. Call sites in descriptor, module, type, and C-method construction now invoke it on the method definition. Its validation and calling-convention behavior remain unchanged.
Changes: PyMethodDef method conversion
| Layer / File(s) |
Summary |
Builder and caller updates crates/capi/src/methodobject.rs, crates/capi/src/descrobject.rs, crates/capi/src/modsupport.rs, crates/capi/src/object/pytype.rs |
build_method_def is now an inherent method on PyMethodDef. The descriptor, module, type, and C-method construction paths invoke it on the definition. Existing validation and calling-convention dispatch remain unchanged. |
Priority: Low
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes
Change: Refactor
Possibly related PRs
- RustPython/RustPython#9484: Adds
PyModule_AddFunctions, which calls build_method_def; this change updates that call to use the method on PyMethodDef.
Suggested reviewers: youknowone
Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 9ca21
-
The refactor preserves the described method-construction behavior. No merge-blocking risk is established; merge after normal checks pass.
Pre-merge checks: 4 · 1
-
Failed checks: 1 warning
| Check name |
Status |
Explanation |
Resolution |
| Docstring Coverage |
 |
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat… |
Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold. |
Passed checks: 4 passed
-
| Check name |
Status |
Explanation |
| Description Check |
 |
Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check |
 |
The title identifies the main change: moving build_method_def into impl PyMethodDef and calling it through the definition. |
| Linked Issues check |
 |
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check |
 |
Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Docstring Coverage
-
Explanation
Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 1 functions across 4 files.
Resolution
Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Finishing Touches
-
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
-
- Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
❤️ Share
-
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Merging this PR will not alter performance
✅ 62 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 4 skipped benchmarks1
Comparing bschoenmaeckers:c-api-method-func (9ca21d4) with main (a838216)
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Assignees
No one assigned
Milestone
No milestone
Development
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
|