GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Expose two interpreter configuration signatures by youknowdot · Pull Request #9609 · RustPython/RustPython

Conversation

@youknowdot

@youknowdot youknowdot commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Expose CPython 3.15 signatures for two cross-interpreter functions:

  • _interpreters.new_config(name='isolated', /, **overrides)
  • _interpreters.list_all(*, require_ready=False)

The wrappers move the original FuncArgs unchanged into the existing manual parsers. Their arity remains unbounded at the outer binder, the duplicate-keyword check cannot match any positional-or-keyword parameter, and callable flags remain as before. Defaults here are static signature metadata, not newly boxed runtime defaults. This PR does not claim complete argument/error parity for the underlying manual parsers. CPython's new_config calling-convention flag differs from RustPython's pre-existing flag.

The other _interpreters mismatches need separate work to preserve manual parser error precedence; this change does not depend on #9563.

Validation

  • Independently source-reviewed against CPython v3.15.0 Modules/_interpretersmodule.c, generated Clinic signatures, RustPython's duplicate binding logic, and the current Report a missing argument before converting any #9513 precheck design.
  • CPython 3.15.0 inspect.signature confirms both signatures; passing a positional name plus a keyword name still leaves the latter in overrides.
  • prek hooks and git diff --check passed.
  • No RustPython compilation or runtime execution was run locally; CI is needed.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

chatgpt-codex-connector[bot] reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@youknowdot
Expose two interpreter configuration signatures
658f25a
Record new_config and list_all parameter metadata without changing their existing manual parsers or runtime default handling.

Assisted-by: dot:frontier-intelligence
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 45 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used all 10 included reviews currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: RustPython/RustPython
  • Branch: main
  • File: .coderabbit.yml
  • Commit: 18fc82b
  • Layers: Repository YAML
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 4f773028-c409-4894-9f9a-1d1692628c3e
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18fc82b and 658f25a.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • crates/vm/src/stdlib/_interpreters.rs
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share
  • X
  • Mastodon
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn

CodeRabbit Verify

  • Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

youknowone
youknowone approved these changes Nov 3, 2026
View reviewed changes
@youknowone
youknowone marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 19:06
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-03T19:09:58.778291Z 658f25a Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@youknowone
youknowone enabled auto-merge (squash) November 3, 2026 19:06
@youknowone
youknowone merged commit bcd0a67 into RustPython:main Nov 4, 2026
20 checks passed

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@youknowone youknowone youknowone approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@youknowdot @youknowone
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.