GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — CLOUDSTACK-8579: Fix cleanup operation in few test cases by gauravaradhye · Pull Request #511 · apache/cloudstack

Conversation

@gauravaradhye

@gauravaradhye gauravaradhye commented Jun 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Cleanup list should be declared before returning from setUpClass() so that tearDownClass() works properly.

Currently the test cases are failing with "Class does not have cleanup attribute".

Tested with passing LXC as hypervisor and test cases skipped successfully without giving any error.

Test the timing issue of root disk data sync ... SKIP: Template creation from root volume is not supported in LXC
TS_BUG_009-Test the size of template created from root disk ... SKIP: Template creation from root volume is not supported in LXC
TS_BUG_010-Test check size of snapshot and template ... SKIP: Template creation from root volume is not supported in LXC
TS_BUG_011-Test Reusing deleted template name ... SKIP: Template creation from root volume is not supported in LXC

Ran 4 tests in 28.247s

OK (SKIP=4)

Test Create/Delete a manual snap shot and verify ... SKIP: Snapshots are not supported on LXC
Test Create/delete a volume and verify correct usage is recorded ... SKIP

Ran 2 tests in 10.303s

OK (SKIP=2)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Gaurav Aradhye
CLOUDSTACK-8579: Fix cleanup operation in few test cases
d7feb1a
@sanju1010

sanju1010 commented Jun 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM...Please commit
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@asfgit asfgit closed this in c841d68 Jun 23, 2015
@asfbot

asfbot commented Jun 23, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

cloudstack-pull-requests #631 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
@gauravaradhye
gauravaradhye deleted the 8579 branch June 24, 2015 10:41
kishankavala pushed a commit to kishankavala/cloudstack that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2015
Gaurav Aradhye @kishankavala
CLOUDSTACK-8579: Fix cleanup operation in few test cases
fc4b332 
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Aradhye <[email protected]>
This closes apache#511
yadvr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2021
@Pearl1594 @yadvr
image: Allows viewing delete/copy iso/template buttons for non ready …
bd134a4 
…resources and enables settings (#517)

Fixes #511

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
weizhouapache pushed a commit to shapeblue/cloudstack that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2025
@shwstppr
FR86 - server: investigate pending HA work when executing in new MS s…
34c3218 
…ession (apache#519)

Fixes apache#511

For HA work items that are created for host state change, checks must be done when execution is called in a new management server session.

A new column, reason, has been added in cloud.op_ha_work table to track the reason for HA work.

When HighAvailabilityManager starts it finds and puts all pending HA work items in Investigating state. During execution of the HA work if it is found in investigating state, checks are done to verify if the work is still valid. If the jobs is found to be invalid it is cancelled.

Upstream PR: apache#10167

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

3 participants

@gauravaradhye @sanju1010 @asfbot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.