GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — The power and time cost is not considered, when powering a host on/off · Issue #238 · cloudsimplus/cloudsimplus

The power and time cost is not considered, when powering a host on/off #238

New issue
Copy link
New issue
Copy link
Closed
#311
Closed
The power and time cost is not considered, when powering a host on/off#238
#311
Copy link
Assignees
wadewaleganesh
Labels
accuracyfeaturepowerIssues related to the Power ModuleIssues related to the Power Module

Description

@jmsw4bn
jmsw4bn
opened on Apr 26, 2020
Issue body actions

ISSUE

When I change the active state of a host.

Actual behavior

No extra power and time cost is spent.

Expected behavior

Actually, extra power and time cost is needed to power on/off a host, and a host cannot directly change from an active state to off state (and vice versa).
I scrutinize the source code, and find that, when setting a host active, the host is active immediately.
Accordingly to the actual situations, it will take tens of seconds to power a host on/off, and during such time extra power is consumed.

Therefore, I suggest to fix this problem to support accurate power-aware simulations.

Available Examples

  • HostActivationExample.java

Related Issues

  • Enable VmAllocationPolicy implementations to power Hosts on and off as required #128

Activity

Next
  1. manoelcampos
    added
    feature
    good-first-issueA good issue to start contributing to the projectA good issue to start contributing to the project
    help wanted
    on Apr 28, 2020
  2. manoelcampos commented on Apr 28, 2020

    @manoelcampos
    manoelcampos
    on Apr 28, 2020
    Collaborator
    More actions

    Hello @jmsw4bn

    Thanks for reporting this issue. You're right. This is a feature inherited from CloudSim. Despite lots of bugs were fixed and new features included, Host's boot and shutdown processes are simplistic and don't consider the time and power consumption.
    But unfortunately, I won't be able to implement this feature in the short term.
    I hope to get some help from the community to implement that.
    If you're willing to do that and need some support, just let me know.

  3. manoelcampos
    added
    powerIssues related to the Power ModuleIssues related to the Power Module
    on May 13, 2020
  4. manoelcampos
    changed the title [-]The power and time cost is not considered, when powering on/off a host.[/-] [+]The power and time cost is not considered, when powering a host on/off[/+] on Aug 28, 2020
  5. wadewaleganesh commented on Apr 2, 2021

    @wadewaleganesh
    wadewaleganesh
    on Apr 2, 2021
    Contributor
    More actions

    I had used cloudSim in the past. And I would like to work on this feature.

  6. manoelcampos commented on Apr 2, 2021

    @manoelcampos
    manoelcampos
    on Apr 2, 2021
    Collaborator
    More actions

    That is great. I think we could start by modeling the proposed solution. Do you have something in mind already?

  7. wadewaleganesh commented on Apr 2, 2021

    @wadewaleganesh
    wadewaleganesh
    on Apr 2, 2021
    Contributor
    More actions

    Currently I don't have a clear idea. I will start reading papers and information regarding

    • what all actions get run while starting and stopping the host
    • time required for all of these actions
    • if required we can simulate these actions too
  8. manoelcampos commented on Apr 3, 2021

    @manoelcampos
    manoelcampos
    on Apr 3, 2021
    Collaborator
    More actions

    The operations performed during startup and shutdown will vary depending on the host OS. Since we don't simulate OS specific features, we should follow a simpler approach.

    The startup up and shutdown time will vary according to the host capacity (CPU cores and MIPS). Host load will impact that too.
    If there are some papers related to that, it would be great.
    Anyway, we should create some interface and classes to model these behaviors, such as the ones that model power consumption (see PowerModelHost).

    This way, an initial class diagram would be great.

  9. wadewaleganesh commented on Apr 14, 2021

    @wadewaleganesh
    wadewaleganesh
    on Apr 14, 2021
    Contributor
    More actions

    Currently I am reading papers regarding that.

    Reacted by Manoel Campos
  10. manoelcampos commented on Apr 14, 2021

    @manoelcampos
    manoelcampos
    on Apr 14, 2021
    Collaborator
    More actions

    Great, if you find some paper that is useful, please provide the DOI link here.

  11. manoelcampos
    assigned
    wadewaleganesh
    on Apr 14, 2021
  12. manoelcampos
    added
    in-progressSomeone has started to work on the issue. The progress may be available at the dev branch.Someone has started to work on the issue. The progress may be available at the dev branch.
    on Apr 14, 2021
  13. wadewaleganesh commented on May 9, 2021

    @wadewaleganesh
    wadewaleganesh
    on May 9, 2021
    Contributor
    More actions

    Unfortunately there are not many papers regarding the issue. I am studying the PowerModelHost

  14. 11 remaining items

  15. manoelcampos
    added 9 commits that reference this issue on Aug 4, 2021

    Initial changes towards cloudsimplus#238

    4d2cd00

    Initial changes towards cloudsimplus#238

    718ffb9

    Initial changes towards cloudsimplus#238

    da0f718

    Initial changes towards cloudsimplus#238

    2910e09

    Initial changes towards #238

    87ed103

    Initial changes towards cloudsimplus#238

    ed86f32

    = Close cloudsimplus#238

    409c9c6

    = Close cloudsimplus#238

    21de906

    = Close cloudsimplus#238

    0daf540
  16. manoelcampos
    closed this as completedin #311on Aug 12, 2021
  17. manoelcampos
    added a commit that references this issue on Aug 12, 2021

    = Close #238

    This issue will close once commit 5270e71 is merged into the 'master' branch.
    5270e71
  18. manoelcampos
    added
    accuracy
    and removed
    help wanted
    in-progressSomeone has started to work on the issue. The progress may be available at the dev branch.Someone has started to work on the issue. The progress may be available at the dev branch.
    good-first-issueA good issue to start contributing to the projectA good issue to start contributing to the project
    on Sep 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

  • @wadewaleganesh
    wadewaleganesh

Labels

accuracyfeaturepowerIssues related to the Power ModuleIssues related to the Power Module

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
    Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.