Applies to every repository in this organization that does not carry its own.

Do not open a public issue. Report privately through GitHub Security Advisories, or by email to [email protected].

We aim to acknowledge a report within 3 business days, and to give a remediation timeline after triage. What helps most:

• what the issue is and what it lets somebody do,
• how to reproduce it — a minimal proof of concept if you have one,
• the version or commit it affects.

draugr-demo is deliberately vulnerable. The injection, the unsafe eval, the known-vulnerable dependencies, the "private key", the root-running container and the privileged pod are all planted, documented in its README, and refreshed on every release. They are the fixture, not a defect — a scanner is only worth evaluating against a case where the answer is already known.

Nothing there is deployed, and the credentials in it are fake. A finding in that repository does not need reporting. A way to make it harm somebody who cloned it does.

Draugr is a security tool, and holding it to the standard it enforces is the least it can do. Every change to the CLI is scanned by the latest released Draugr — dependency vulnerabilities, leaked secrets, static analysis and infrastructure misconfiguration — with the results published to that repository's Security → Code scanning tab where anybody can read them. Releases are signed with keyless cosign and ship SBOMs and build provenance, and the install script verifies that signature before it installs anything.

The draugr repository's own policy has the detail, including how to verify a release yourself.