GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — Update OSS-Fuzz Scripts to Use New QA-Assets Repo Structure by DaveLak · Pull Request #1913 · gitpython-developers/GitPython

Conversation

@DaveLak

@DaveLak DaveLak commented May 8, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

merging gitpython-developers/qa-assets#2 should be coordinated with merging this PR.

This change is required to support the changes to the seed data repo structure introduced in:
gitpython-developers/qa-assets#2

This moves most of the seed data related build steps into the OSS-Fuzz Docker image build via container-environment-bootstrap.sh. This includes moveing the dictionaries into that repo.

The fuzzing/README.md here should be updated in a follow-up with a link to the qa-assets repo (and probably some context setting about corpora in general) but I have opted to defer that as I think the functionality added by the seed data improvements is valuable as is and shouldn't be blocked by documentation writers block.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@DaveLak
Update OSS-Fuzz Scripts to Use New QA-Assets Repo Structure
2cfd200
This change is required to support the changes to the seed data repo
structure introduced in:
gitpython-developers/qa-assets#2

This moves most of the seed data related build steps into the OSS-Fuzz
Docker image build via `container-environment-bootstrap.sh`. This
includes moveing the dictionaries into that repo.

The fuzzing/README.md here should be updated in a follow-up with a link
to the qa-assets repo (and probably some context setting about corpora
in general) but I have opted to defer that as I think the functionality
added by the seed data improvements is valuable as is and shouldn't be
blocked by documentation writers block.
@DaveLak DaveLak mentioned this pull request May 8, 2024
Restructure Fuzzer Seed Data gitpython-developers/qa-assets#2
Merged
Byron
Byron approved these changes May 8, 2024
View reviewed changes

@Byron Byron left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for driving fuzzing forward, relentlessly!

I will set this to auto-merge so when done, you could merge the PR in qa-assets yourself.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

DaveLak reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction
@DaveLak

DaveLak commented May 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot for driving fuzzing forward, relentlessly!

Thanks for letting me! I've still got my eyes on gitoxide fuzzing, so don't worry 😄

I will set this to auto-merge so when done, you could merge the PR in qa-assets yourself.

Thanks! Will do.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Byron

Byron commented May 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It turns out there is no auto-merging for me, so I will just merge both myself when I get back.

DaveLak reacted with heart emoji
All reactions
  • ❤️ 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Byron
Byron merged commit a5815b6 into gitpython-developers:main May 8, 2024
@DaveLak
DaveLak deleted the refactor-oss-fuzz-scripts-to-use-new-qa-assets-repo-layout branch May 8, 2024 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Byron Byron Byron approved these changes

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

2 participants

@DaveLak @Byron
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.