GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — BF: remove a submodule with a remote without refs + misc fixes around by yarikoptic · Pull Request #521 · gitpython-developers/GitPython Conversation
Contributor
now if there is a remote without any refs (this happens e.g. with git-annex repo with special remotes), it would refuse to remove the submodule
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. As it was - many tests were simply not accounted/run at all originally draft committed by mistake in 31fd955 sorry
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
yarikoptic
commented
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. and I am not sure why that is the case -- I was expecting submodules repo to be the repo of the submodule ... but I guess it can make sense to refer to parent which contains the submodule, but then is there an attribute for submodules repo (if present)?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Byron any comment? I'm not familiar with git-modules.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
yarikoptic
added a commit
to yarikoptic/GitPython
that referenced
this pull request
codecov in our (datalad, etc) experience provides a better service, great support, and super-nice intergration with chromium and firefox for reviewing coverage of pull requests. In light of the @with_rw_directory fiasco detected/fixed in gitpython-developers#521 I would strongly recommend to (re-)enable and use coverage reports
yarikoptic
added a commit
to yarikoptic/GitPython
that referenced
this pull request
codecov in our (datalad, etc) experience provides a better service, great support, and super-nice intergration with chromium and firefox for reviewing coverage of pull requests. In light of the @with_rw_directory fiasco detected/fixed in gitpython-developers#521 I would strongly recommend to (re-)enable and use coverage reports
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Indeed @yarikoptic your 31fd955 fixed an important regression introduced by #519, So, I'm cherry picking your 2528d11 and 31fd955 but modified to include only your |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
+ The actual commits have been re-written and rebased previously.
|
On Travis, PY3.3 failed due to file-handles; increased ulimit 96-->100 solved the problem. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Forgot to thank you. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
That is OK, if you like to see me there - add, otherwise I am just fine. Cheers. Thanks for attending to my PRs quickly |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.