GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Fixes to support Python 2.6 again. by andy-maier · Pull Request #541 · gitpython-developers/GitPython Conversation
|
Current coverage is 94.51% (diff: 96.72%)@@ master #541 diff @@ ========================================== Files 63 63 Lines 9882 9920 +38 Methods 0 0 Messages 0 0 Branches 0 0 ========================================== + Hits 9326 9376 +50 + Misses 556 544 -12 Partials 0 0
|
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
7e35290 to
a795f40
Compare
|
@andy-maier In the meanwhile, merge conflicts have shown up. I will gladly merge this PR once they are fixed. Thank you. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Will do, tomorrow. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
9364ea0 to
9ff3f02
Compare
Details: - Added Python 2.6 again to .travis.yml (it was removed in commit 4486bcb). - Replaced the use of dictionary comprehensions in `git/cmd.py` around line 800 with the code before that change (in commit 25a2ebf). Reason: dict comprehensions were introduced only in Python 2.7. - Changed the import source for `SkipTest` and `skipIf` from `unittest.case` to first trying `unittest` and upon ImportError from `unittest2`. This was done in `git/util.py` and in several testcases. Reason: `SkipTest` and `skipIf` were introduced to unittest only in Python 2.7, and `unittest2` is a backport of `unittest` additions to Python 2.6. - In git/test/lib/helper.py, fixed the definition of `assertRaisesRegex` to work on py26. - For Python 2.6, added the `unittest2` dependency to `requirements.txt` and changed `.travis.yml` to install `unittest2`. Because git/util.py uses SkipTest from unittest/unittest2, the dependency could not be added to `test-requirements.txt`. - Fixed an assertion in `git/test/test_index.py` to also allow a Python 2.6 specific exception message. - In `is_cygwin_git()` in `git/util.py`, replaced `check_output()` with `Popen()`. It was added in Python 2.7. - Enabled Python 2.6 for Windows: - Added Python 2.6 for MINGW in .appveyor.yml. - When defining `PROC_CREATIONFLAGS` in `git/cmd.py`, made use of certain win32 and subprocess flags that were introduced in Python 2.7, dependent on whether we run on Python 2.7 or higher. - In `AutoInterrupt.__del__()` in `git/cmd.py`, allowed for `os` not having `kill()`. `os.kill()` was added for Windows in Python 2.7 (For Linux, it existed in Python 2.6 already).
9ff3f02 to
f3d5df2
Compare
|
The "rebase" got a little larger because I enabled Python 2.6 also for Windows now, and I added a Python 2.6 environment for both Appveyor (MINGW) and Travis (An earlier commit removed it from Travis). Unlike earlier, Python 2.6 is now mandatory in Travis in this PR. I think this is the best way to keep it working in the future. If and when an unsurmountable issue with Python 2.6 pops up, it can quickly be removed again. Please review again. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@andy-maier have you taken into account my 2 review comments? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
No, I'm sorry. I was not aware of your comments. Where can I find them? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
They are visibile in this PR, a couple of comments above embedded. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
That's where I looked first, but I don't see them. Maybe something behaves different because this is a PR from my fork and I force-pushed to the branch? Anyway, could you please copy them here? |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Never mind, i will push on top some commits. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
I'm really having problem working with PY26 - there are still some unofficial python-sites for this release, but are really slow or unmaintained. As I said, this deprecated platform is not only a development burden for us but a security liability for you. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
@andy-maier Thanks a lot for your contribution, it's much appreciated! I have had a look at the commit, and believe it's OK to merge under the assumption that we can remove or revert it at any time should there be any issues cropping up, or if it becomes an additional burden to maintain it. @ankostis Please feel free to revert this commit in case it is a security liability in itself. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| # otherwise these'll end up in args, which is bad. | ||
| _kwargs = {k: v for k, v in kwargs.items() if k in execute_kwargs} | ||
| kwargs = {k: v for k, v in kwargs.items() if k not in execute_kwargs} | ||
| _kwargs = dict() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you replace it with this more pythonic and quicker to follow (in debug-mode also) code?
_kwargs = dict(k, v) for k, v in kwargs.items() if k in execute_kwargs) kwargs = dict((k, v) for k, v in kwargs.items() if k not in execute_kwargs)
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
| ddt | ||
| mock No newline at end of file | ||
| mock | ||
| unittest2; python_version < '2.7' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you modify also setup.py and test-requirements.txt?
if sys.version_info[:2] < (2, 6): test_requires.append('unittest2')
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Apply codereview comments of gitpython-developers#541 (review)
Apply codereview comments of gitpython-developers#541 (review)
Apply codereview comments of gitpython-developers#541 (review)
Apply codereview comments of gitpython-developers#541.
|
No prob, the PR is fine. Just did a minor pythonism included in #555 to convert a loop as a 2 lines, to facilitate debuging. |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.