GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — From note: name an unrefined parameter as the unknown value's origin by CatarinaGamboa · Pull Request #526 · liquid-java/liquidjava Conversation
Collaborator
Closes #522, part 1 of 5: From note F3, unrefined parameter. Design: #522 (comment) A refinement error whose Expected says nothing the verifier knows now gets a message note naming the cause, when the value is an unrefined parameter of the enclosing method. The CLI prints the note under the headline. When the note is printedAll of these must hold, or there is no note:
The note restates the declaration. It says nothing about callers and adds no fact to Found. A2_04, before and after (only study task that changes) Refinement Error: expected timeout >= 0 but could not prove it
+ From: timeout is a parameter of checkCimReachable(String, int) (line 94) with no refinement
103 |
104 | try (Socket socket = new Socket()) {
105 | socket.connect(new InetSocketAddress(host, port), timeout);A2_10, A1_38, A1_01, A1_56, A1_09, practice and practice2 are byte-identical to main. Each task still gives exactly one error, on its Changes
Conflicts
Tests: 🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsA refinement error whose Expected is only about parameters of the enclosing method that are declared with no refinement now has the message note "From: <p> is a parameter of <m>(<types>) (line L) with no refinement". It restates the declaration and says nothing about callers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Collaborator
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Collaborator
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
CatarinaGamboa
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Closes #522, part 2: **origin notes F1 and F2**, where the wrong state comes from. Design: #522 (comment) **Base: `main`.** #526 is merged. #530 is stacked on this PR, so retarget it to `main` before merging this one with `--delete-branch`. ## The Origin note The PM's review renamed the note from **"From:"** to **"Origin:"**, because "From" read like `@StateRefinement(from = …)` in declared-here. Every origin note now has one shape, `Origin: <where>, <call or variable> <verb> <state or refinement>`, and only the verb changes. The first commit renames the note #526 merged (`FromNotes` → `OriginNotes`, `TestFromNotes` → `TestOriginNotes`). The soundness conditions are unchanged. | Case | Text | |---|---| | F1, the call that last set the sets | `Origin: line 134, new BufferedInputStream(stream) makes markState(buffered) == unmarked` | | F2, a returned value | `Origin: line 130, writer.getDefaultWriteParam() returns compression(wParam) == compressionNotExplicit` | | F2, nothing known | `Origin: line 69, frame.getUndoManager() says nothing about redoState(undoManager)` | | F1 fallback, creation | `Origin: line L, new T(…) creates x with <state>` | | F3 (#526) | `Origin: line 94, timeout is a parameter of checkCimReachable(String, int) with no refinement` | "Makes" is used only for the call the walk proves last set the shown sets. The fallback says "creates … with", because a later call may have set the state again. That is a fact about the constructor, not about the current state. ## When there is no note at all No origin note is given when the receiver may change state out of the verifier's sight before the call. That covers three cases: - **Another name may hold it.** A local, a parameter or `this` is used, before the call, other than as the target of a call or field access or in `==`/`!=`. That means copied, passed as an argument (including to the failing call itself), stored in an array, returned, bound in a method reference (`x::start`), or used in a lambda or a local class. "Before" means earlier in the source, in the failing call's arguments, or in a loop around the call, unless the use is inside a `return`/`throw`. - **A method of the analyzed code with no state refinement is called on it before.** The verifier assumes such a call keeps the state. - **It is a field.** Declared state contracts are trusted, as the verifier trusts them. A body that breaks its own declared contract is a verifier issue, outside the notes (see the round 3 reply). ## Which sets The note covers the sets that the failing call's `from` checks. When the state machine models the call, it narrows them to the sets where some state the receiver may be in is the state of no allowed state. This only selects what is shown (S1). ## F1, a state set by a call Walk back from the receiver through `StateChange`/`previous()` to the first change whose `to` names a shown set. The note is printed only if: - every instance on the way has a `StateChange`, so the walk crosses no join, loop head or unknown origin; - every change crossed names none of the shown sets. Each `to` keeps the sets it does not name, through `set(this) == set(old(this))`; - `StateSolver.implies(<instance after that change>, <Found's facts on the shown sets>)` holds. Text: `Origin: line L, <call> makes <Found on the sets that change names>`. With two wrong sets, a change to one is not given the other. **Fallback, when the walk breaks.** The note gives the creation fact only if all hold: - the receiver is a local whose only write is its initializer, a constructor call with a single state refinement; - no other call on it is to a method that changes state, and no loop may repeat the failing call; - Found's facts on the shown sets imply what that constructor gives. Text: `Origin: line L, new T(…) creates x with <state>`. It is a fact about the constructor. The last condition stops it from speaking when the state may have changed since (A1_09). ## F2, a state from a returned value Printed only if the walk reaches, possibly after crossing changes to other sets, an instance with no `StateChange` that holds the call result it was assigned. Instances now record a `CallResult` when a local is declared or assigned from a call to a refined method. A state-preserving call keeps it, as it keeps the `StateChange`. Joins, loop heads and transitions make new instances without one. - `Origin: line L, <call> returns <facts>`: the conjuncts of the instantiated return refinement on the shown sets. Printed only if they imply Found's facts on those sets. - `Origin: line L, <call> says nothing about <set>(x)`: printed only if all hold: - Found has no fact on the sets; - the method has no state refinement with a `to` (as `to = "running(_)"`); - the return refinement names no state of them, mentions no variable but `_`, and uses no alias. This rules out `_ == this`-style returns; - no shown set has a generated name (`state1`), which the message would otherwise never show. ## DebugLog check for A1_38 (asked before coding F1) With `-d`, the VC at `buffered.reset()` (line 157) has a single `buffered` instance, `#buffered_259 : (stream == open) ∧ (markState == unmarked)`. That is the constructor's state, with no ITE and no loop-head instance. The note also took the F1 path, which needs a `StateChange` on that instance. So neither loop (lines 136 and 150) creates a join for `buffered`. A broken walk now logs `[WARN] Origin note: no known call gives #x_n its state, e.g. a join of branches`. A1_09 logs it for `#host_95`. ## Study tasks, before (main) and after ```diff State Refinement Error: found stream(buffered) == open && markState(buffered) == unmarked but expected markState(buffered) == marked && stream(buffered) == open + Origin: line 134, new BufferedInputStream(stream) makes markState(buffered) == unmarked ``` ```diff State Refinement Error: found compression(wParam) == compressionNotExplicit but expected compression(wParam) == compressionExplicit || compression(wParam) == compressionTypeSet + Origin: line 130, writer.getDefaultWriteParam() returns compression(wParam) == compressionNotExplicit ``` ```diff State Refinement Error: expected redoState(undoManager) == redoable but could not prove it + Origin: line 69, frame.getUndoManager() says nothing about redoState(undoManager) ``` ```diff Refinement Error: expected timeout >= 0 but could not prove it - From: timeout is a parameter of checkCimReachable(String, int) (line 94) with no refinement + Origin: line 94, timeout is a parameter of checkCimReachable(String, int) with no refinement ``` - A1_09: no origin note. Its receiver is a join, and Found does not say the state `new JFrame(…)` gives. - A2_10, practice and practice2: unchanged. Each task still gives exactly one error, on its `reportedLine`. All three notes are the review's mock-ups, word for word. I checked every state-error fixture of the suite. Each note names the creating or the last call. After the Codex rounds, the fallback fires in none, and fixtures where the receiver is captured, a field, `this` in a loop, or given an unspecified call get no note. ## Tests `TestOriginNotes`, three tests that fail without the change: - `ErrorStateHintMultipleSets` (existing): `Origin: line 27, d.lock() makes lockState(d) == locked`. Only the wrong set is named, and the walk stops at the change to it; - `ErrorStateFromReturnedValue` (new, small; no existing fixture assigns a state from a return refinement): `Origin: line 27, FromReturnedTask.create() returns phase(task) == idle`. - `ErrorDeferredCallbackState` (existing): the receiver captured by a lambda gets no note. `mvn test`: 736 run, 0 failures. ## Conflicts - With #520/#521 (another agent: `AuxStateHandler` declared-here): the one `throwStateRefinementError` call in `changeState`, which gets a `messageNotes` argument. The rest is additive. - With #518/#519 (`StateHints`): none. - With #527 (state counterexample, mine): both add a parameter to `throwStateRefinementError`, a one-line rebase. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Say where the wrong state or value comes from (From note), and counterexamples for state errorsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |