GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Infer string literals at comparison locations by DanielRosenwasser · Pull Request #6196 · microsoft/TypeScript Conversation
Member
This PR removes ad-hoc checks for string-like types by adding new contextual types for literal types at select locations. It addresses some of the major issues brought up in #6167 by adding strictness where users are most interested. A literal type is inferred for any string literal in a literal match location, defined as such:
String literals can still get string literal types through contextual typing, but a check for whether a string is in a literal match location will be apply first. This means that the following will now error: if ("foo" === "bar") { // ... } because types
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
…, and equality comparisons.
4 tasks
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does this even need to be a type? I mean, do you actually use the type for anything, or just check if it exists? I feel like a boolean is more appropriate.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That actually might be a better way to go about it.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably don't need this
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why not just pass
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess I assumed too much when I wrote the above comment. Additionally, you need to because we just skipped
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Oh I see what you mean now about isExpression. And good point about
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Anders Hejlsberg (ahejlsberg)
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Merged
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
Domain: Literal Types
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |