GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — fallback: return available bytes on short feed-based reads by zhechen-cs · Pull Request #752 · msgpack/msgpack-python ConversationWith a feed-based Honor Validation on macOS arm64, CPython 3.12:
The existing
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
methane
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
`Unpacker.read_bytes()` does not reject negative lengths. The C extension raises an internal `SystemError` from `PyBytes_FromStringAndSize`; the Python implementation accepts the count and can return an unintended slice of buffered data. Raise `ValueError` for a negative byte count before reading or updating the stream position in either implementation. Four regression cases cover feed-based and file-based unpackers with `-1` and a larger negative count. They also check that the failed call leaves the position unchanged and that zero-length reads and subsequent reads/unpacking still work. On Windows/Python 3.13, all four cases fail with each unchanged implementation. With the fix, the complete C-extension suite has 164 passed and 1 skipped; the Python suite has 161 passed and 4 skipped. Both retain three existing unknown-marker warnings for `thread_unsafe` when the free-threaded test plugin is absent. Repository-wide Ruff lint and format checks pass. Other OS/Python and free-threaded matrices were not run locally. Related: #742 validates negative sizes in the packer header APIs; this change covers the unpacker's raw-byte reader. #752 concerns short feed-based reads, which is a separate case. AI assistance: OpenAI Codex investigated, generated and self-reviewed the patch, and ran the local checks. No separate human review is claimed. This branch has not been deployedNo deployments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersNo reviewsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |