GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — build: remove cctest extension by yhwang · Pull Request #16680 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@yhwang

@yhwang yhwang commented Nov 2, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cctest appends so.59 when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fix the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang [email protected]

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the build Issues and PRs related to Node.js builds or CI infrastructure. label Nov 2, 2017
@jasnell
jasnell requested review from bnoordhuis and refack November 2, 2017 05:06
@gibfahn

gibfahn commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

cc/ @nodejs/gyp

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

bnoordhuis
bnoordhuis approved these changes Nov 2, 2017
View reviewed changes

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11149/

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
jasnell
jasnell approved these changes Nov 2, 2017
View reviewed changes
@refack refack self-assigned this Nov 2, 2017
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

despite of node-test-commit-arm-fanned, seems linux and plinux were failed in this test case: parallel/test-http2-server-rst-stream. Is it a intermittent failure recently?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@jasnell

jasnell commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That was a known flaky test. The fix just landed. It's unrelated to this pr

yhwang reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@yhwang
yhwang force-pushed the cctest-in-node-shared branch from f881e6a to 15be1b7 Compare November 2, 2017 20:28
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

okay, found it : #16690. And it's landed. Can someone rerun the CI? Thanks.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

thanks @jasnell then the failures on the CI above are from here https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-binary-arm/11442/. is this critical and need to figure out? The run_subset 6 passed in all pi

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

mhdawson
mhdawson approved these changes Nov 2, 2017
View reviewed changes

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@mhdawson

mhdawson commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

New CI run: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11158/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

still got some failures:

  • parallel/test-async-wrap-uncaughtexception (should be related to test: fix flaky test-async-wrap-uncaughtexception #16598)
  • sequential/test-inspector-bindings # TODO : Fix flaky test
  • Build 4,pi1-raspbian-wheezy
  • Build 3,pi1-raspbian-wheezy

However, I think these are not related to my change.

gibfahn reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@gibfahn

gibfahn commented Nov 2, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

However, I think these are not related to my change.

Yep, you never need to worry about the flaky tests, and the Pi failures are known issues.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

cjihrig
cjihrig approved these changes Nov 2, 2017
View reviewed changes
gibfahn
gibfahn approved these changes Nov 2, 2017
View reviewed changes
gireeshpunathil
gireeshpunathil approved these changes Nov 3, 2017
View reviewed changes
danbev
danbev approved these changes Nov 3, 2017
View reviewed changes
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 7, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Ping, Is there anything that I should do in order to get this to be landed?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@yhwang
build: remove cctest extension
b167b28
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>
@yhwang
yhwang force-pushed the cctest-in-node-shared branch from 15be1b7 to b167b28 Compare November 10, 2017 20:23
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 10, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Resolved the conflict and need a new CI. Thanks!

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

refack
refack approved these changes Nov 10, 2017
View reviewed changes
@refack

refack commented Nov 10, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11344/

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@refack

refack commented Nov 10, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Landed in b340c2d

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@refack refack closed this Nov 10, 2017
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2017
@yhwang @refack
build: remove cctest extension
b340c2d
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: nodejs#16680
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 10, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

thanks @refack

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@yhwang
yhwang deleted the cctest-in-node-shared branch November 10, 2017 22:13
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2017
@yhwang @evanlucas
build: remove cctest extension
a4557f2
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #16680
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
@evanlucas evanlucas mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2017
v9.2.0 proposal #16992
Merged
@MylesBorins

MylesBorins commented Nov 17, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Should this be backported to v6.x-staging or v8.x-staging? If yes please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if not let me know or add the dont-land-on label.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@MylesBorins MylesBorins added backport-requested-v6.x labels Nov 17, 2017
@yhwang

yhwang commented Nov 17, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@MylesBorins yes, it should be backported to v6.x-staging or v8.x-staging. I will follow the guide to do the backport. Thanks for the reminding.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

yhwang added a commit to yhwang/node that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2017
@yhwang
build: remove cctest extension
8d3e7e1
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: nodejs#16680
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
@yhwang yhwang mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2017
[v6.x backport] build: remove cctest extension #17255
Closed
2 tasks done
@yhwang yhwang mentioned this pull request Nov 22, 2017
[v8.x backport] build: remove cctest extension #17258
Closed
2 tasks done
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2017
@yhwang @MylesBorins
build: remove cctest extension
a0c1d10
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

Backport-PR-URL: #17255
PR-URL: #16680
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins added backported-to-v6.x and removed backport-requested-v6.x labels Nov 28, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2017
v6.12.1 proposal #17180
Merged
yhwang added a commit to yhwang/node that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@yhwang
build: remove cctest extension
3c88538
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: nodejs#16680
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@yhwang @gibfahn
build: remove cctest extension
5174d25
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #16680
Backport-PR-URL: #17258
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2018
@yhwang @gibfahn
build: remove cctest extension
e61344a
cctest has `so.59` extension when building node shared library in linux.
The appending is defined in node.gypi and the cctest target in node.gyp
includes node.gypi. Moving the appending from node.gypi to node target
in node.gyp fixes the issue.

Signed-off-by: Yihong Wang <[email protected]>

PR-URL: #16680
Backport-PR-URL: #17258
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs added backported-to-v8.x and removed backport-requested-v8.x labels Jun 20, 2018
@refack refack removed their assignment Oct 12, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis bnoordhuis approved these changes
@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes
@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes
@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil approved these changes
+4 more reviewers
@refack refack refack approved these changes
@danbev danbev danbev approved these changes
@mhdawson mhdawson mhdawson approved these changes
@gibfahn gibfahn gibfahn approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

build Issues and PRs related to Node.js builds or CI infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

12 participants

@yhwang @gibfahn @jasnell @mhdawson @refack @MylesBorins @bnoordhuis @danbev @cjihrig @gireeshpunathil @BethGriggs @nodejs-github-bot
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.