GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: use Promise.all() in test-hash-seed by Trott · Pull Request #32273 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Pummel CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-custom-suites-freestyle/12864/ ✅ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Pummel CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-custom-suites-freestyle/12912/ |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways, including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea. PR-URL: nodejs#32273 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]>
|
Landed in 1a3c747 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways, including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea. PR-URL: #32273 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]>
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways, including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea. PR-URL: #32273 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]>
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways, including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea. PR-URL: #32273 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.