GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — async_hooks,worker: fix process.exit() crashes in async fn with async_hook enabled by addaleax · Pull Request #33347 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
worker: call CancelTerminateExecution() before exiting LockerAs the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t async_hooks: clear async_id_stack for terminations in more placesTermination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads test: regression tests for async_hooks + Promise + Worker interactionAdd regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all Checklist
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests).
|
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/31271/ (:yellow_heart:) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
This is surprising, reading 13c5a16 I don't understand why it causes the test behavior change. (The changes themselves in this PR look fine although I also don't understand why CancelTerminateExecution is needed) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
…raction Co-authored-by: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Me neither, really.
Yeah, me neither. I think the reason that V8 aborts here is that some |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/31280/ (💛) |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
|
Landed in c7eeef5...e65d189 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
As the comment indicates, this fixes a DCHECK failure, although I don’t quite understand why it is happening in the first place. PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Termination exceptions are similar to uncaught exceptions in that they should clear the async id stack, because no ongoing async callbacks will be brought to completion when execution terminates. Previously, there was a check that made sure that that happened when the termination occurred during the callback itself, but no such check was in place for the case that the termination occurred during microtasks started by them. This commit adds such a check, both for microtasks and the `nextTick` queue. The latter addition doesn’t fix a crash, but still makes sense conceptually. The condition here is also flipped from applying only on Worker threads to also applying on the main thread, and setting the `failed_` flag rather than reading it. The former makes sense because the public C++ `Stop(env)` API can have the same effect as worker thread termination, but on the main thread rather than a Worker thread. PR-URL: nodejs#33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Add regression tests for the case in which an async_hook is enabled inside a Worker thread and `process.exit()` is called during the async part of an async function. This commit includes multiple tests that seem like they should all crash in a similar way, but interestingly don’t. In particular, it’s surprising that the presence of a statement after `process.exit()` in a function has an effect on the kind of crash that’s being exhibited (V8 DCHECK vs. assertion in our own code) and the circumstances under which it crashes (e.g. the -1 and -2 tests can be “fixed” by reverting 13c5a16, although they should have the same behavior as the -3 and -4 tests). PR-URL: #33347 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: nodejs#33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: nodejs#33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: #33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> PR-URL: #65819 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: #33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> PR-URL: #65819 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: #33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> PR-URL: #65819 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
After `Stop(env)`, freeing the Environment and creating another one on the same isolate failed whenever no JavaScript ran in between: the new Environment's first script was terminated before it started. That is the normal case when `Stop()` is called from the process exit handler for an uncaught exception, or by an embedder while the loop is idle. `Stop()` calls `isolate->TerminateExecution()` unless `kDoNotTerminateIsolate` is set, and V8 only clears that request the next time JavaScript runs, so it outlived the Environment it was meant for. Cancel a pending termination when the Environment it was meant for is freed. `Worker::Run()` already did this by hand before freeing its Environment, with a TODO asking why V8 hit a DCHECK without it; this is why, and that call now happens in `FreeEnvironment()`. Refs: #33347 Signed-off-by: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]> PR-URL: #65819 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.