GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: increase read file abort coverage by shootermv · Pull Request #36716 · nodejs/node Conversation
shootermv
force-pushed
the
increase-abort-readfile-test-coverage
branch
from
d347db7 to
5a80156
Compare
benjamingr
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM, I would make the comment shorter, thanks for this :)
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Lxxyx
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM except one nit, you can include a link in the commit message, to let us know which part of the code test coverage has been improved, like this pull request: #36628
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
jasnell
approved these changes
Trott
approved these changes
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
benjamingr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
PR-URL: #36716 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
PR-URL: #36716 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
PR-URL: #36716 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
test
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |