GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — meta: replace API docs issue template with form by Trott · Pull Request #41348 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@Trott

@Trott Trott commented Dec 28, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

All other issue templates have been moved to forms, which seems to do a
good job of reducing spam issues.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Trott
meta: replace API docs issue template with form
f898044
All other issue templates have been moved to forms, which seems to do a
good job of reducing spam issues.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Dec 28, 2021
tniessen
tniessen approved these changes Dec 28, 2021
View reviewed changes
VoltrexKeyva
VoltrexKeyva approved these changes Dec 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Dec 29, 2021
apapirovski
apapirovski approved these changes Dec 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
lpinca
lpinca approved these changes Dec 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
Ayase-252
Ayase-252 approved these changes Dec 29, 2021
View reviewed changes
@Trott Trott added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Dec 30, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Dec 31, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit 0de6a63 into nodejs:master Dec 31, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Dec 31, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in 0de6a63

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott
Trott deleted the ref-doc-yml branch December 31, 2021 03:41
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2022
@Trott @targos
meta: replace API docs issue template with form
1f6c4e8
All other issue templates have been moved to forms, which seems to do a
good job of reducing spam issues.

PR-URL: #41348
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Qingyu Deng <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2022
v17.4.0 release proposal #41557
Merged
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2022
@Trott @danielleadams
meta: replace API docs issue template with form
b696284
All other issue templates have been moved to forms, which seems to do a
good job of reducing spam issues.

PR-URL: #41348
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Qingyu Deng <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2022
@Trott @danielleadams
meta: replace API docs issue template with form
970de53
All other issue templates have been moved to forms, which seems to do a
good job of reducing spam issues.

PR-URL: #41348
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Qingyu Deng <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Feb 1, 2022
v16.14.0 proposal #41804
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes
@tniessen tniessen tniessen approved these changes
@Ayase-252 Ayase-252 Ayase-252 approved these changes
+2 more reviewers
@apapirovski apapirovski apapirovski approved these changes
@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

7 participants

@Trott @nodejs-github-bot @apapirovski @lpinca @tniessen @Ayase-252 @VoltrexKeyva
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.