GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — lib: define Event.isTrusted in the prototype by santigimeno · Pull Request #46974 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
We have been discussing in nodejs/performance#32 whether deviating from the spec with regards to I'd like to have some feedback whether a change like this would be ok for Node.js (not being in the browser), specially from people more familiar with the standard. If that's the case I'll update the tests that are currently failing. Thanks!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
anonrig
reviewed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
santigimeno
force-pushed
the
santi/is_trusted_proto
branch
from
9235d8d to
6cf3af6
Compare
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
anonrig
approved these changes
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Seems like a good tradeoff to me: obscure and largely irrelevant property vs. big performance jump.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32
santigimeno
force-pushed
the
santi/is_trusted_proto
branch
from
6cf3af6 to
f7c80d9
Compare
santigimeno
marked this pull request as ready for review
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
anonrig
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🚀
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
This was referenced
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jasnell
approved these changes
Member
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: #46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Merged
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: #46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: #46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: #46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
danielleadams
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: #46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MoLow
pushed a commit
to MoLow/node
that referenced
this pull request
Don't conform to the spec with isTrusted. The spec defines it as `LegacyUnforgeable` but defining it in the constructor has a big performance impact and the property doesn't seem to be useful outside of browsers. Refs: nodejs/performance#32 PR-URL: nodejs#46974 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
bartlomieju
pushed a commit
to denoland/deno
that referenced
this pull request
This PR optimizes `Event` constructor - ~Added a fast path for empty `eventInitDict`~ Removed `EventInit` dictionary converter - Don't make `isTrusted` a [LegacyUnforgeable](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#LegacyUnforgeable) property. Doing so makes it non-spec compliant but calling `Object/Reflect.defineProperty` on the constructor is a big bottleneck. Node did the same a few months ago nodejs/node#46974. In my opinion, the performance gains are worth deviating from the spec for a browser-related property. **This PR** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 36.69 ns/iter 27,257,504.6 (33.36 ns … 42.45 ns) 37.71 ns 39.61 ns 40.07 ns event constructor 36.7 ns/iter 27,246,776.6 (33.35 ns … 56.03 ns) 37.73 ns 40.14 ns 41.74 ns ``` **main** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 380.48 ns/iter 2,628,275.8 (366.66 ns … 399.39 ns) 384.58 ns 398.27 ns 399.39 ns event constructor 480.33 ns/iter 2,081,882.6 (466.67 ns … 503.47 ns) 484.27 ns 501.28 ns 503.47 ns ``` ```js Deno.bench("event constructor no init", () => { const event = new Event("foo"); }); Deno.bench("event constructor", () => { const event = new Event("foo", { bubbles: true, cancelable: false }); }); ``` towards #20167
littledivy
pushed a commit
to littledivy/deno
that referenced
this pull request
This PR optimizes `Event` constructor - ~Added a fast path for empty `eventInitDict`~ Removed `EventInit` dictionary converter - Don't make `isTrusted` a [LegacyUnforgeable](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#LegacyUnforgeable) property. Doing so makes it non-spec compliant but calling `Object/Reflect.defineProperty` on the constructor is a big bottleneck. Node did the same a few months ago nodejs/node#46974. In my opinion, the performance gains are worth deviating from the spec for a browser-related property. **This PR** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 36.69 ns/iter 27,257,504.6 (33.36 ns … 42.45 ns) 37.71 ns 39.61 ns 40.07 ns event constructor 36.7 ns/iter 27,246,776.6 (33.35 ns … 56.03 ns) 37.73 ns 40.14 ns 41.74 ns ``` **main** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 380.48 ns/iter 2,628,275.8 (366.66 ns … 399.39 ns) 384.58 ns 398.27 ns 399.39 ns event constructor 480.33 ns/iter 2,081,882.6 (466.67 ns … 503.47 ns) 484.27 ns 501.28 ns 503.47 ns ``` ```js Deno.bench("event constructor no init", () => { const event = new Event("foo"); }); Deno.bench("event constructor", () => { const event = new Event("foo", { bubbles: true, cancelable: false }); }); ``` towards denoland#20167
littledivy
pushed a commit
to denoland/deno
that referenced
this pull request
This PR optimizes `Event` constructor - ~Added a fast path for empty `eventInitDict`~ Removed `EventInit` dictionary converter - Don't make `isTrusted` a [LegacyUnforgeable](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#LegacyUnforgeable) property. Doing so makes it non-spec compliant but calling `Object/Reflect.defineProperty` on the constructor is a big bottleneck. Node did the same a few months ago nodejs/node#46974. In my opinion, the performance gains are worth deviating from the spec for a browser-related property. **This PR** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 36.69 ns/iter 27,257,504.6 (33.36 ns … 42.45 ns) 37.71 ns 39.61 ns 40.07 ns event constructor 36.7 ns/iter 27,246,776.6 (33.35 ns … 56.03 ns) 37.73 ns 40.14 ns 41.74 ns ``` **main** ``` cpu: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900H runtime: deno 1.36.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) benchmark time (avg) iter/s (min … max) p75 p99 p995 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- event constructor no init 380.48 ns/iter 2,628,275.8 (366.66 ns … 399.39 ns) 384.58 ns 398.27 ns 399.39 ns event constructor 480.33 ns/iter 2,081,882.6 (466.67 ns … 503.47 ns) 484.27 ns 501.28 ns 503.47 ns ``` ```js Deno.bench("event constructor no init", () => { const event = new Event("foo"); }); Deno.bench("event constructor", () => { const event = new Event("foo", { bubbles: true, cancelable: false }); }); ``` towards #20167
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
author ready
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |