GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — tools: update codecov branch by Trott · Pull Request #47285 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@Trott

@Trott Trott commented Mar 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Trott
Trott marked this pull request as ready for review March 28, 2023 18:51
@Trott Trott added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Mar 28, 2023
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @Trott. Please 👍 to approve.

MoLow, tniessen, mhdawson, and anonrig reacted with thumbs up emoji
All reactions
  • 👍 4 reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

richardlau
richardlau approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
MoLow
MoLow approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
tniessen
tniessen approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
@Trott

Trott commented Mar 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I hope we don't have a problem where this doesn't work because it's not on the old default branch, but I guess we can cross that bridge/issue when we get to it.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

mhdawson
mhdawson approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@tniessen

tniessen commented Mar 28, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I hope we don't have a problem where this doesn't work because it's not on the old default branch, but I guess we can cross that bridge/issue when we get to it.

statsmodels/statsmodels#7424 contains a screenshot showing a configuration option in the codecov UI. (codecov appears to have picked up your branch (nodejs/node/tree/codecov) and shows it just like main or any other branch, so your suspicion might be correct and changing it might not have any effect.)

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

anonrig
anonrig approved these changes Mar 28, 2023
View reviewed changes
@Trott

Trott commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I hope we don't have a problem where this doesn't work because it's not on the old default branch, but I guess we can cross that bridge/issue when we get to it.

statsmodels/statsmodels#7424 contains a screenshot showing a configuration option in the codecov UI. (codecov appears to have picked up your branch (nodejs/node/tree/codecov) and shows it just like main or any other branch, so your suspicion might be correct and changing it might not have any effect.)

Alas, I don't have access to that settings page for Node.js.

Since the old branch redirects to the new one in the GitHub interface, I'm slightly hopeful, but only slightly, that this will work.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott Trott added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Mar 29, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Mar 29, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator
Commit Queue failed
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/47285
✔  Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/47285
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title      tools: update codecov branch (#47285)
Author     Rich Trott  (@Trott)
Branch     Trott:codecov -> nodejs:main
Labels     fast-track
Commits    1
 - tools: update codecov branch
Committers 1
 - Rich Trott 
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau 
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow 
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen 
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson 
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli 
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau 
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow 
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen 
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson 
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ℹ  This PR was created on Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:51:43 GMT
   ✔  Approvals: 5
   ✔  - Richard Lau (@richardlau) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285#pullrequestreview-1361728795
   ✔  - Moshe Atlow (@MoLow): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285#pullrequestreview-1361734226
   ✔  - Tobias Nießen (@tniessen) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285#pullrequestreview-1361740131
   ✔  - Michael Dawson (@mhdawson) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285#pullrequestreview-1361766478
   ✔  - Yagiz Nizipli (@anonrig): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/47285#pullrequestreview-1362075227
   ℹ  This PR is being fast-tracked
   ✘  Last GitHub CI failed
   ℹ  Green GitHub CI is sufficient
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   ✔  Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu
https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/4549058299
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott

Trott commented Mar 29, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Am I wrong or does something seem to be happening where node-core-utils now always thinks GitHub CI has failed?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott
tools: update codecov branch
786a718
Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the
current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up
automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it
in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

PR-URL: nodejs#47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
@Trott
Trott force-pushed the codecov branch from d3ad6d3 to 786a718 Compare March 29, 2023 02:06
@Trott

Trott commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Landed in 786a718

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott
Trott merged commit 786a718 into nodejs:main Mar 29, 2023
@Trott
Trott deleted the codecov branch March 29, 2023 02:06
@Trott

Trott commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I've opened a support ticket with Codecov.io to try to get the default branch issue resolved.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@targos

targos commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think we need to add the Codecov GitHub app to this repo so they can check who has the admin permissions?

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@tniessen

tniessen commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I was able to change the default branch through the codecov UI after someone enabled the GitHub app.

Trott reacted with rocket emoji
All reactions
  • 🚀 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@targos

targos commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Am I wrong or does something seem to be happening where node-core-utils now always thinks GitHub CI has failed?

I added some logs in ncu and found the following:

  • Error is from this line.

Context:

[
  {
    __typename: 'StatusContext',
    context: 'codecov/project',
    description: '89.48% (-0.03%) compared to 09a4bb1',
    targetUrl: 'https://codecov.io/gh/nodejs/node/pull/47285'
  },
  {
    __typename: 'StatusContext',
    context: 'codecov/patch',
    description: 'Coverage not affected when comparing 09a4bb1...786a718',
    targetUrl: 'https://codecov.io/gh/nodejs/node/pull/47285'
  }
]
All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@targos

targos commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

If you scroll down, the failing check is actually visible in the GitHub UI:
CleanShot 2023-03-29 at 18 01 41

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott

Trott commented Mar 29, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I was able to change the default branch through the codecov UI after someone enabled the GitHub app.

I enabled it to test if it would give me admin access and it didn't. But I only removed access again just now. Sorry for not communicating this. (I...uh....guess I should have opened something in nodejs/admin but that seemed overkill. Bad Trott? Do better?)

tniessen reacted with laugh emoji
All reactions
  • 😄 1 reaction

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

targos added a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2023
@targos
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
28b694e
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: nodejs#47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2023
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses #47306
Merged
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2023
@targos
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
d918bf4
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2023
2023-04-18, Version 20.0.0 (Current) #47381
Merged
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
@Trott @RafaelGSS
tools: update codecov branch
810bac8
Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the
current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up
automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it
in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

PR-URL: #47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
@targos @RafaelGSS
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
53f3eed
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2023
v19.9.0 proposal #47441
Merged
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
@Trott @RafaelGSS
tools: update codecov branch
752c265
Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the
current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up
automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it
in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

PR-URL: #47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
@targos @RafaelGSS
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
5bcf0e8
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2023
@Trott @RafaelGSS
tools: update codecov branch
c1ef1fd
Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the
current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up
automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it
in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

PR-URL: #47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2023
@targos @RafaelGSS
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
af98218
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2023
@targos @RafaelGSS
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
c340de6
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
@Trott @danielleadams
tools: update codecov branch
a682bd0
Codecov is still using the old default branch. Update it to "main", the
current default branch. I'm not sure why it's not picking it up
automatically or if there is a way to ask it to refresh, but setting it
in codecov.yml should resolve the issue.

PR-URL: #47285
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]>
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
@targos @danielleadams
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
397992e
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: #47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: #47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
@targos @MoLow
tools: disable Codecov commit statuses
e1846ee
We don't want (yet?) to consider coverage as a requirement for
landing a pull request.

Refs: nodejs#47285 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.codecov.com/docs/commit-status#disabling-a-status
PR-URL: nodejs#47306
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2023
v18.17.0 release proposal #48694
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@anonrig anonrig anonrig approved these changes
@tniessen tniessen tniessen approved these changes
@richardlau richardlau richardlau approved these changes
@MoLow MoLow MoLow approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@mhdawson mhdawson mhdawson approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

8 participants

@Trott @tniessen @nodejs-github-bot @targos @anonrig @richardlau @MoLow @mhdawson
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.