GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — build: update action to close stale PRs by mhdawson · Pull Request #48196 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time.
The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsMy original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Collaborator
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Mesteery
approved these changes
mhdawson
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]>
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
RafaelGSS
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]>
Merged
Ceres6
pushed a commit
to Ceres6/node
that referenced
this pull request
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]>
Ceres6
pushed a commit
to Ceres6/node
that referenced
this pull request
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in nodejs#48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]>
ruyadorno
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
My original plan of adding a lable to limit those initially process as outlined in #48051 does not work I think because adding a lable updates the last update time. - Removing the need for the lable - Remove the cron scheduling so that it only runs when I run it manually - Fix the display name for the action as I missed updating that after cut and paste from existing action The plan will be to find stop dates that should only affect a reasonable number of PRs at a time and then run in batches using that instead. Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> PR-URL: #48196 Reviewed-By: Mestery <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers1 more reviewerUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
author ready
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |