GeezerVison

Original commit message:

    [api] Add v8::ScriptCompiler::CachedData::CompatibilityCheck()

    This patch adds a new API v8::ScriptCompiler::CachedData::CompatibilityCheck()
    in order to allow embedders to check if the code cache can be used in
    the current isolate without looking up for the source code. It also returns more detailed reasons about why the code cache cannot be used
    when it's bound to be rejected. This makes it possible to enforce
    portability checks in case code code becomes CPU-dependent in the
    future.

    Refs: nodejs#42566 (comment)

    Change-Id: Ia1d677b949050add961af6fbf62c44342c061312
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4905290
    Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#90833}

Refs: v8/v8@efb1133
PR-URL: nodejs#51551
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>

Original commit message:

    [api] Add v8::ScriptCompiler::CachedData::CompatibilityCheck()

    This patch adds a new API v8::ScriptCompiler::CachedData::CompatibilityCheck()
    in order to allow embedders to check if the code cache can be used in
    the current isolate without looking up for the source code. It also returns more detailed reasons about why the code cache cannot be used
    when it's bound to be rejected. This makes it possible to enforce
    portability checks in case code code becomes CPU-dependent in the
    future.

    Refs: #42566 (comment)

    Change-Id: Ia1d677b949050add961af6fbf62c44342c061312
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4905290
    Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <[email protected]>
    Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#90833}

Refs: v8/v8@efb1133
PR-URL: #51551
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>