GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — doc: explicitly state that corepack will be removed in v25+ by trivikr · Pull Request #57747 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
The generic "future versions of" Node.js is causing a confusion among corepack users. This PR explicitly changes it to v25+ as agreed in TSC vote in nodejs/TSC#1697 (comment)
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
ljharb
approved these changes
lpinca
approved these changes
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
trivikr
force-pushed
the
corepack-removal-version
branch
from
683c103 to
1a83409
Compare
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
MikeMcC399
reviewed
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
trivikr
requested review from
MikeMcC399 and
aduh95
and removed request for
MikeMcC399
styfle
approved these changes
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the clarity!
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
BridgeAR
approved these changes
gurgunday
approved these changes
RaisinTen
approved these changes
MikeMcC399
reviewed
|
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with Node.js 25+. | |
| Corepack itself will no longer be distributed with release lines Node.js 25 and above. |
You could also write "releases Node.js >=25.0.0" using semver notation.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
|
Landed in b6a10f7 |
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #57747 Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
## 요약 #257에서 컨테이너를 `node:26-bookworm-slim`으로 올렸지만 CI의 test 작업은 여전히 Node.js 24로 실행되고 있었습니다. 이 PR은 `actions/setup-node`의 `node-version`을 `"26"`으로 올려 테스트와 컨테이너의 Node 주 버전을 맞춥니다. Node.js 25부터 Corepack이 함께 배포되지 않으므로, `Dockerfile`과 같은 `[email protected]`을 먼저 설치한 뒤 `corepack enable`을 실행합니다. - 근거: [Node.js Corepack 문서](https://nodejs.org/dist/latest/docs/api/corepack.html), [nodejs/node#57747](nodejs/node#57747) - `package.json`의 `engines`(`>=24`)와 README의 요구 버전은 바꾸지 않았습니다. Node 24도 계속 지원 범위입니다. ## 검증 - `trunk check .github/workflows/ci.yaml` → exit 0 - 이 PR의 CI test 작업이 Node.js 26에서 type check, unit, DB, workerd 검사를 실행하는 것이 실제 검증입니다. ## Decisions taken where the brief was silent - corepack 버전은 `Dockerfile`과 같은 0.36.0으로 고정했습니다. 두 곳의 버전을 함께 올려야 합니다.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.