GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | |||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | |||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js by Trott · Pull Request #9486 · nodejs/node Conversation
Member
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)test debugger Description of changeThe test This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsThe test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI.
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
cjihrig
approved these changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM. I forget - why are the debugger tests not run on the CI? Is it because they aren't in good enough shape?
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
santigimeno
approved these changes
jasnell
approved these changes
JungMinu
approved these changes
princejwesley
approved these changes
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: nodejs#9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
Member
Author
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: #9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
addaleax
pushed a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: nodejs#9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: #9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: #9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on <address>:<port>`. This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof it at least a little bit against subsequent changes. This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests are not run in CI. PR-URL: #9486 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers+1 more reviewerUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
test
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | |||
| You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |