GV

GeezerVison

The World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory.

Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites

On this site

  • Sign in
  • ActionsCI/CD and automation
  • CodespacesCloud development environments
  • All Features
  • Documentation
  • Training
  • Certifications
  • Build with Copilot
  • Customize Copilot
  • Integrations
  • Trending repos
  • GitHub Sponsors
  • Developer articles
  • Enterprises

This view

  • Original page
  • New address

GeezerVison is showing github.com — test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js by Trott · Pull Request #9486 · nodejs/node

Conversation

@Trott

@Trott Trott commented Nov 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
  • make -j8 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test debugger

Description of change

The test debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer listening on port <port> but is instead listening on <address>:<port>.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Trott
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
72640f5
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.
@Trott Trott added debugger test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Nov 6, 2016
@Trott

Trott commented Nov 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@nodejs/testing

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

cjihrig
cjihrig approved these changes Nov 6, 2016
View reviewed changes

@cjihrig cjihrig left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There was a problem hiding this comment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I forget - why are the debugger tests not run on the CI? Is it because they aren't in good enough shape?

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

All reactions
@Trott

Trott commented Nov 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

why are the debugger tests not run on the CI? Is it because they aren't in good enough shape?

Yes.

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

santigimeno
santigimeno approved these changes Nov 6, 2016
View reviewed changes
jasnell
jasnell approved these changes Nov 7, 2016
View reviewed changes
JungMinu
JungMinu approved these changes Nov 7, 2016
View reviewed changes
princejwesley
princejwesley approved these changes Nov 7, 2016
View reviewed changes
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2016
@Trott
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
1323db0
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: nodejs#9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
@Trott

Trott commented Nov 10, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Landed in 1323db0

All reactions

Sorry, something went wrong.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

@Trott Trott closed this Nov 10, 2016
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2016
@Trott @addaleax
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
ee76069
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: #9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
@Trott @addaleax
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
e97c610
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: nodejs#9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
@addaleax addaleax added land-on-v6.x labels Dec 8, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
@Trott @MylesBorins
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
13cace1
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: #9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins added land-on-v4.x and removed lts-watch-v4.x labels Dec 21, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
@Trott @MylesBorins
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
28e33f3
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: #9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2016
@Trott @MylesBorins
test: fix helper-debugger-repl.js
36320f6
The test `debugger/test-debugger-repl-break-in-module` (and probably
others) was failing because the handshake message for debugging is no
longer `listening on port <port>` but is instead `listening on
<address>:<port>`.

This change makes the check less strict so as to hopefully future-proof
it at least a little bit against subsequent changes.

This test failure is not caught in CI because currently debugger tests
are not run in CI.

PR-URL: #9486
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
This was referenced Dec 21, 2016
V6.9.3 proposal #10394
Merged
V4.7.1 proposal #10395
Merged
@Trott
Trott deleted the fix-debug-test branch January 13, 2022 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes
@santigimeno santigimeno santigimeno approved these changes
@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes
@JungMinu JungMinu JungMinu approved these changes
+1 more reviewer
@princejwesley princejwesley princejwesley approved these changes
Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Uh oh!

There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

8 participants

@Trott @jasnell @santigimeno @princejwesley @cjihrig @JungMinu @MylesBorins @addaleax
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
You are visitor 01402520 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up.
Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required.