GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — fix: use a monotonic clock for the cache polling timeout by csviri · Pull Request #3529 · operator-framework/java-operator-sdk Conversation
Collaborator
Switches to No test is added: reproducing this requires controlling the clock, and the Part of #3517
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
13 of 16 tasks
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Pull request overviewThis PR fixes a correctness issue in Changes:
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. `pollLocalCache` computed its deadline with `LocalTime`:
var startTime = LocalTime.now();
final var timeoutTime = startTime.plus(timeoutMillis, ChronoUnit.MILLIS);
while (timeoutTime.isAfter(LocalTime.now())) {
`LocalTime` is a time of day and wraps at midnight, so for any call made
within `timeoutMillis` of 00:00 the computed deadline is *earlier* than
the current time. The loop body never runs and the method throws
`OperatorException("Timeout of resource polling from cache for resource")`
immediately, failing the update it was retrying even though the resource
would have appeared in cache. With the default 10s timeout that is a
10-second window each day.
`LocalTime.now()` is also wall-clock based, so an NTP step or a DST change
can shorten or extend the timeout.
Switches to `System.nanoTime()`, which is monotonic and has no wrap-around
concern, using overflow-safe subtraction for the comparison.
No test is added: reproducing this requires controlling the clock, and the
class is already deprecated for removal.
csviri
force-pushed
the
fix/poll-local-cache-midnight-wraparound
branch
from
1718892 to
cbac64f
Compare
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Pull request overviewCopilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
csviri
marked this pull request as ready for review
csviri
commented
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. LGTM
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactionsUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
csviri
added a commit
to csviri/java-operator-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
…amework#3529) `pollLocalCache` computed its deadline with `LocalTime`: var startTime = LocalTime.now(); final var timeoutTime = startTime.plus(timeoutMillis, ChronoUnit.MILLIS); while (timeoutTime.isAfter(LocalTime.now())) { `LocalTime` is a time of day and wraps at midnight, so for any call made within `timeoutMillis` of 00:00 the computed deadline is *earlier* than the current time. The loop body never runs and the method throws `OperatorException("Timeout of resource polling from cache for resource")` immediately, failing the update it was retrying even though the resource would have appeared in cache. With the default 10s timeout that is a 10-second window each day. `LocalTime.now()` is also wall-clock based, so an NTP step or a DST change can shorten or extend the timeout. Switches to `System.nanoTime()`, which is monotonic and has no wrap-around concern, using overflow-safe subtraction for the comparison. No test is added: reproducing this requires controlling the clock, and the class is already deprecated for removal.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reviewers
Copilot code review
Copilot
Copilot review effort
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesNo one assignedLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |