GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GeezerVison is showing github.com — Respect explicit node x/y positions in fixed-arrangement Sankey by kyo5uke · Pull Request #7826 · plotly/plotly.js Conversation
Contributor
OverviewFixes the bug reported in #7758: when a Sankey trace specifies explicit Root causeThe "Force node position" loop in for(i = 0; i < Math.min(trace.node.x.length, trace.node.y.length, graph.nodes.length); i++) { if(trace.node.x[i] && trace.node.y[i]) { /* ... graph.nodes[i] ... */ } } That assumption does not hold:
Either case shifts every later node's array position away from its original input index. In the Each node already stores its original input index as Change
for(i = 0; i < graph.nodes.length; i++) { var forcedNode = graph.nodes[i]; if(forcedNode.partOfGroup) continue; var p = forcedNode.pointNumber; if(trace.node.x[p] && trace.node.y[p]) { /* ... forcedNode ... */ } }
Testing
I'll add the NoteThere is a related path I deliberately left out of scope: Closes #7758
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
camdecoster
requested changes
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks for the PR! Good bug hunting. I requested some changes, but I'd also like to see if you could address the similar issue (that you mentioned) in
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think 0 coords will get dropped with the existing check (preexisting bug). Let's update it. This should take care of
Suggested change
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Comment on lines
+247
to
+250
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. All reactions
Contributor
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong. Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. …itions # Conflicts: # test/jasmine/tests/sankey_test.js
camdecoster
approved these changes
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ReviewersUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. AssigneesLabels
None yet
ProjectsMilestoneNo milestoneDevelopmentSuccessfully merging this pull request may close these issues. Explicit node coordinates (x/y positions) not fully respected in Sankey diagramUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |