GeezerVisonThe World Wide Web, restored to 800 pixels of glory. |
| Home|About|Gaming cabinet|Archives|How it works|Starter sites |
GeezerVison is showing github.com — JavaFX Requires 'code' Folder to Run · Issue #1327 · processing/processing4 Closed Labels enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request DescriptionMost relevant area for this enhancement?Build process Feature to enhancePre-installation of javafx.xxxx.jar files in another folder. Enhancement detailsPull request #856 added all seven of the javafx modules to the Processing editor. However, some users particularly on Linux and Windows were unable to run JavaFX demos without manually adding a 'code' folder to the sketch and copy/pasting the jar files or drag 'n dropping the javafx.jar files onto an open sketch to create the 'code' folder automatically. The javafx.xxxxx.jar files were present, but buried deeper inside operating system folders and inside a nested 'modules' folder. Unfortunately the runtime did not know how to access these files. The issue has been discussed in detail here: https://discourse.processing.org/t/processing-and-javafx/45692/13 Related Finding: Solution: Confirmation: Test javafx source code: import javafx.scene.canvas.Canvas; import javafx.scene.layout.StackPane; Canvas canvas; StackPane root; void setup(){ size(350,200,FX2D); surface.setTitle("JavaFX in Default Wnd"); canvas = (Canvas)surface.getNative(); root = (StackPane)canvas.getParent(); } void draw(){ fill(0,255,0); circle(width/2,100,100); } Processing/libraries/javafx/library folder should look like this on Windows 11:
Would you like to help implement this enhancement?Yes, I’d like to help with this ActivityMetadataMetadataAssigneesLabelsenhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request TypeProjectsMilestoneRelationshipsDevelopmentIssue actions |
| You are visitor 01402503 — GeezerVison does not store the pages you look up. Best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.7 or Internet Explorer 6 at 800×600. No cookies required. |