Description

AlexWaygood

opened on May 10, 2024

Issue body actions

We've discovered that if you manually type out a condition that evaluates to False in the new REPL, False is printed as the result, as expected...

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
False

...but that if you copy and paste this condition into the REPL, nothing is printed (implying that the condition evaluates to None:

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
>>> 

Thanks @Eclips4 for realising that the difference in behaviour here was due to copying-and-pasting the condition rather than typing it out!

Originally posted by @AlexWaygood in #111201 (comment)

Linked PRs

• gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately #119318
• [3.13] gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (GH-119318) #119408

Reacted by Miro Hrončok

Activity

1. AlexWaygood

   added

   topic-replRelated to the interactive shellRelated to the interactive shell

   type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

   3.13only security fixesonly security fixes

   3.14bugs and security fixesbugs and security fixes

   on May 10, 2024
2. serhiy-storchaka commented on May 10, 2024

   

   serhiy-storchaka

   on May 10, 2024

   Member

   More actions

   It is not only with conditions, but with any expressions, including literals.

   Reacted by Alex Waygood, Kirill Podoprigora and sobolevn
3. pablogsal

   added 5 commits that reference this issue on May 21, 2024

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately

   c40ed58

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately

   fcc44e6

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately

   40df02e

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately

   a5cd942

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately

   06ccec4
4. ambv

   added a commit that references this issue on May 21, 2024

   gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (#119318)

   a3e4fec
5. miss-islington

   added a commit that references this issue on May 22, 2024

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (p…

   76b149e
6. lysnikolaou

   added a commit that references this issue on May 22, 2024

   [3.13] gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (G…

   a463cd8
7. AlexWaygood commented on May 23, 2024

   

   AlexWaygood

   on May 23, 2024

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Looks like this is now fixed! (@pablogsal or @ambv please reopen if there's more to do!)
8. AlexWaygood

   closed this as completedon May 23, 2024
9. estyxx

   added a commit that references this issue on Jul 17, 2024

   pythongh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (p…

   83f9099

Issue actions