Description

tomasr8

opened on May 1, 2025

Issue body actions

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Context: #132940 (comment)

[...] In fact, it was always my intention to validate it, but if you check out the validation function in Tools/cases_generator/optimizer_generator.py, it says TODO 😉 . I just had no time to get around to do it.

This is the TODO: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Tools/cases_generator/optimizer_generator.py#L33

I already have something somewhat working, will try to open a PR tomorrow :)

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

#132940 (comment)

Linked PRs

• gh-133273: Keep instruction definitions in bytecodes.c and optimizer_bytecodes.c in sync  #133320

Activity

1. tomasr8

   added

   topic-JIT

   type-featureA feature request or enhancementA feature request or enhancement

   on May 1, 2025
2. tomasr8

   self-assigned this

   on May 1, 2025
3. picnixz

   added

   interpreter-core(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)(Objects, Python, Grammar, and Parser dirs)

   on May 4, 2025
4. Fidget-Spinner

   added a commit that references this issue on May 8, 2025

   gh-133273: Keep instruction definitions in `bytecodes.c` and `optimiz…

   3f2f59a
5. Fidget-Spinner commented on May 8, 2025

   

   Fidget-Spinner

   on May 8, 2025

   Member

   More actions

   Thanks Tomas!

   Reacted by Tomas R.
6. Fidget-Spinner

   closed this as completedon May 8, 2025
7. Pranjal095

   added a commit that references this issue on Jul 12, 2025

   pythongh-133273: Keep instruction definitions in `bytecodes.c` and `o…

   c65de78
8. taegyunkim

   added a commit that references this issue on Aug 4, 2025

   pythongh-133273: Keep instruction definitions in `bytecodes.c` and `o…

   123b7f4

Issue actions